Bank of Canada leaves target rate at 1 percent

The Bank of Canada has left the overnight target rate at 1%. The announcement is here.

Key quotation:

The global economic recovery is entering a new phase. In advanced economies, temporary factors supporting growth in 2010 – such as the inventory cycle and pent-up demand – have largely run their course and fiscal stimulus will shift to fiscal consolidation over the projection horizon. While the Bank expects that private demand in advanced economies will become sufficiently entrenched to sustain the recovery, the combination of difficult labour market dynamics and ongoing deleveraging in many advanced economies is expected to moderate the pace of growth relative to prior expectations. These factors will contribute to a weaker-than-projected recovery in the United States in particular. Growth in emerging-market economies is expected to ease to a more sustainable pace as fiscal and monetary policies are tightened. Heightened tensions in currency markets and related risks associated with global imbalances could result in a more protracted and difficult global recovery.

To translate this into everyday English, the Bank of Canada believes that the growth in the economic recovery is now leveling, and that it is not entirely certain what the next stage will be. They are reading the same tea leaves that everybody else is reading.

Inflation in Canada has been slightly below the Bank’s July projection. The recent moderation in core inflation is consistent with the persistence of significant excess supply and a deceleration in the growth of unit labour costs. The Bank judges that the output gap is slightly larger and that the economy will return to full capacity by the end of 2012 rather than the beginning of that year, as had been anticipated in July. The inflation outlook has been revised down and both total CPI and core inflation are now expected to converge to 2 per cent by the end of 2012, as excess supply in the economy is gradually absorbed and inflation expectations remain well-anchored.

The Bank of Canada will be putting the brakes on further interest rate increases until 2011 at the earliest. I do not project a December rate increase.

Three month corporate paper is yielding 1.17%, and three-month treasury bills are yielding 0.89% yesterday. Today, this will decrease a little bit.

More important are the spread to longer term bonds, which 5 years will yield you 1.95% and 10 years will yield 2.76%.

Pay attention to the 30-year treasury bond

With all the talk of the US Federal Reserve performing another round of quantitative easing (which amounts to repurchasing medium and long-dated government debt securities in an attempt to lower long term interest rates and frustrate people into purchasing anything else where they can get a decent yield on cash), the markets have started to get a bit antsy on the macroeconomic front.

Since the strength of the US dollar is a huge global variable, whenever the US Federal Reserve does something, the rest of the world, including domestic US investors, will notice. And indeed, the world has reacted by tanking the currency. More interestingly, however, is the rise in treasury yields (lower treasury prices):

In theory when you have the full force of the US Federal Reserve behind a position (in this case, purchasing government bonds), you try to get out of the way. This time, the market’s reaction appears to be one of indigestion – an exit from bonds. This is very interesting and if the trend continues, will have huge ramifications on investor’s calculations as to what exactly constitutes a “risk free rate”.

It is increasingly clear that US government debt is not as “risk free” as people may think, and this risk should be appropriately adjusted in financial calculations.

The easiest way for an investor to directly take a stake in this (other than buying or shorting treasury futures, which is a relatively trivial transaction to perform) is to buy or sell units in NYSE: TLT, which is an ETF that contains long-dated treasury instruments of 20 years and above. TLT is down about 8% from two months ago, when US Treasury bonds were trading at a local minimum of 3.5%. During the pits of the economic crisis, the US Treasury bond traded as high as 2.5% as investors dove for the safest haven.

A question in the financial markets should now be – exactly how safe is the “safest haven”? If the answer is anything other than US government debt, this would explain the currency exodus.

As a comparison, Canadian long term benchmark yields have generally gravitated down from August – reaching a high of 3.72% in August, and currently trading at 3.45%, and a low of 3.33% seen in late September. Clearly, the crisis hitting the US bond market is not hitting the Canadian bond market, at present.

My perception is that if this is the beginning of a “run” on US long term debt, there will be huge financial ripples in the US marketplace – for example, what do you do when you see a corporate long-term bond trading at a yield of 7%, when the 30-year US government debt is trading at the same yield? We are not there yet, but rising US government bond yields will crush the corporate debt market window that is currently open.

Watch out, because I suspect things are getting exciting again.

Canadian dollar at par

The Canadian dollar is once again at par with the US dollar – if you are performing currency transactions, just remember to get the CAD-USD vs. USD-CAD conversions correct!

The currency rise has not as much to do with the Canadian dollar rising as it does with the US currency depreciating – the world is strongly reacting to the imminent quantitative easing 2 that the federal reserve is apparently planning on to spur inflation.

Whistler-Blackcomb going public

Whistler-Blackcomb, owned by Intrawest, filed to go public on the TSX. The salient numerical details, such as the total amount of the offering (rumoured to be $300 million) and pricing of the company’s stock remains to be seen.

Intrawest used to be public, but was taken private in 2006 and is now owned by Fortress Investment Group.

Although I have not completely read the document (and won’t until the issue has a price), of note is that the public entity will hold 75% of the Whistler-Blackcomb partnership (page 128); the corporation will have an additional $261 million in debt taken out; and the entity will generally have historically made about $50-60 million in income from 2007, 2008 and 2009. Note that because the corporation has a 75% interest in the partnership, that some accounting rules will kick in and subtract the 25% minority interest, so the net income figure will be lower.

This offering is being touted in the media as an income play, which is likely why the company is going public right now – to get out while the premium paid for income-bearing securities is red hot.

I have a paper napkin valuation which will likely be lower than what the actual selling price will be. I also think there are a whole host of risks that this venture are correlated to – including the resort real estate business, and BC tourism in general. I believe the company is using the elevated 2010 numbers from the Winter Olympics to tout their equity, which will be a mistake for investors to depend on. The 9 months ended 2010 show a $52 million income year, compared to $58 million the year before. Note the last quarter of the year is a money-loser.

The BP Saga is nearly over

The US government yesterday now allows drilling applications to take place in the Gulf of Mexico. There will be increased scrutiny with respect to contingency plans that will make the already expensive process even more so, but there will eventually be drilling back in the Gulf.

This nearly closes the saga on the BP oil spill – although you hardly hear of any further environmental consequences. The only story left will be a decade of litigation in court to determine who pays for the damages.

Be careful of people touting their horns – what I’m about to write will be a high magnitude of chest-beating.

Earlier, I gave a fairly accurate forecast of the financial consequences. I made a projection on June 16, after BP had cut its dividend, that if you were playing BP, one should purchase BP shares between $25 to $30/share. BP subsequently made it to $26.75/share, which would have resulted in a 65% fill. On July 15, stated that one should exit BP at $45 to $50/share (this is after it spiked up to $39/share), and July 27, I fine-tuned the price model to $42-47/share. I stated that BP should be around that price range by the end of the year.

Currently, BP is trading at $41.50/share, so it is within striking range of this price range where an investor should offload the shares. Indeed, the price risk from the oil spill has been mitigated to a degree from the stock, so investors in BP at this moment should be evaluating the company not with political risk in mind, but operational risk of the various businesses it controls around the world, and of course, the price of oil.

BP still looks undervalued strictly from an earnings and “price of oil” perspective – they have a huge amount of reserves and production going on, and will likely continue to make money in the foreseeable future. Analysts expect the company to earn about $6.51/share in 2011, which gives it a 6.4x P/E ratio, or about 15.7% yield from current earnings. By comparison, Exxon has a 9.7x P/E ratio on 2011 earnings. Even though it is an operational basket case, BP still looks dramatically undervalued.

Always keep in mind that analyst projects tell you what the market is pricing in – so in order to make money from the present, you have to believe the company will make more money than what the analysts are predicting. In theory, the analyst estimates are baked into the current stock price.

One prediction that has not come to fruition yet has been a June 16 prediction that the drillers will fare better than BP – right now, BP is leading the two drillers I selected by about one percent. When re-evaluating the drillers, I think BP is now the better deal.

There is a reason why I do not like large capitalization companies – many other eyeballs have spent time looking at the companies far longer than you have, which makes your potential advantage in properly valuing such companies to be less probable.