Atlantic Power – after the buyout

It’s always interesting to see what happens to companies after they get bought out. It makes you wonder whether the price you are receiving is well-deserved or not.

In the case of Atlantic Power, they were bought out for approximately US$270 million plus the assumption of debt (not a trivial amount, roughly US$560 million).

I was just doing some checking up and noticed that Innergex bought the Curtis Palmer hydroelectric project. They paid US$318 million, which implies an EBITDA multiple of about 7.5x.

This was the gem of Atlantic Power.

I also notice they inked a deal with New Jersey to decommission their only coal plant (a 40% economic interest) at Chambers effective May 2022, where they would have received a capitalized value of the remaining power purchase agreement. This PPA was set to expire in 2024. I’m not sure exactly how much the payout was, but I would estimate it would have been around US$80-90 million.

This leaves 19 projects remaining, consisting of biomass, natural gas and hydro generators.

Atlantic Power was a very interesting company to analyze, and run by top-grade management that I would follow in a heartbeat if they decided to manage another public company.

A bird in the hand vs. two in the bush – Atlantic Power

“Bittersweet” is the word I used to describe the acquisition of Atlantic Power (TSX: ATP), and also the words that James Moore used as well in his conference call.

“Bittersweet” is also the word I’m going to use to describe my exit out of the stock yesterday.

I did not view the chances of a higher bid to be likely and I should have pounded my shares out of the exit a couple days after the merger was announced (which got up to a high of US$3.06, compared to the proposed cash acquisition of US$3.03 – this was on January 20th and the merger announcement was on the evening of January 14th). Instead, I took a ~5% hit from the proposed price and paid a fairly hefty merger arbitrage spread.

The reason was simple – they announced they received 90% of the medium term note holders’ consents for the merger, but the following paragraph was in yesterday’s press release:

Atlantic Power also announced today that the meeting (the “Debentureholder Meeting”) of holders (“Debentureholders”) of its 6.00% Series E convertible unsecured subordinated debentures due January 31, 2025 initially scheduled to be held on March 18, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. ( Toronto time) is being adjourned to Wednesday, April 7, 2021 at 12:00 p.m. ( Toronto time) to allow additional time to solicit proxies.

This is not good news.

All parts of the capital structure require a 2/3rds vote to approve the merger. Quorum is 25%, which should not be the limiting constraint at this point.

If proxies were received that already expressed approval for the merger to that quantity, the meeting would have been held and one more hoop would have been jumped through for merger completion. It is a virtual guarantee that an insufficient number of votes or an insufficient number of affirmative votes has been received to date.

If they held the meeting and did not receive the 2/3rds supermajority, the vote would have failed and the merger would have to been renegotiated (which leads to all sorts of other risks).

The adjournment of this vote does not bode well for the overall merger.

We do not know how many votes have been received in favour or against.

The risk has been elevated significantly leading up to the April 7th shareholder vote.

Although iSquared is raising debt financing in preparation for the merger, if the entire capital structure of Atlantic Power does not go along with this, iSquared has the right to terminate the merger.

This will most certainly involve the common shares trading back down to the US$2.00-$2.20 level (and the preferred shareholders will most certainly head down to around the $17-18 level).

Just imagine you are the management of the company and the merger fails due to a negative vote. Mentally, you’ve already checked out and are preparing to transition out of the company. Instead, your shareholders (or possibly in this case, your debtholders) have blocked your exit. What do you do? It’s not an easy position to be in. You can sell your stake in the company (Moore owns more than a million shares and was prepared to receive a significant golden parachute) and get out of there. Another option is staying on board and just keep status quo and clipping paycheques while the stock languishes.

Another possibility is that iSquared will pay off the debentureholders. Indeed, given how ATP.DB.E is virtually guaranteed to get paid out no matter what happens (maturity is January 2025), why not be a pain in the ass and ask for more?

I’d estimate the risk of a failed vote happening to be about 20% at present. Not too high, but enough for me to punch out the clock and take the bird in the hand rather than two in the bush. To say the least, this has been a sloppy exit, but at least the rapidly depreciating cash that is sitting in the account will eventually find a better home.

Atlantic Power – on the nature of power generation

James J. Moore Jr. has done an incredible job with Atlantic Power – it is unfortunate the IPP industry as a whole has faced significant headwinds over the past decade. In what is (hopefully) his final letter to shareholders, he writes the following (underlining is my emphasis):

What about the new green energy policies? Shouldn’t they have a positive impact on Atlantic Power?

I have said in the past the power business is cyclical, capital-intensive and commodity-priced. I also have cited the Warren Buffett adage that when a management team with a reputation for brilliance tackles an industry with poor economics, it is invariably the industry that survives with its reputation intact. More money has been lost in the energy space by investing in themes (surfing green waves, combined-cycle gas plants in the late 90s, YieldCo’s, peak oil, etc.) than any other way I have witnessed. I have repeatedly noted to shareholders the challenging markets for power and the poor fundamental outlook. Public policies pushing green energy and electrification have not pushed demand up as much or as quickly as taxpayer subsidies, state Renewable Portfolio Standards and corporate commitments to green energy have pushed up the supply of generation. Our hydro portfolio contributed 24% of our 2020 Project Adjusted EBITDA, but that EBITDA was generated under PPAs which were signed in the pre-fracking era when power prices were substantially higher. Market prices today are a fraction of those PPA levels. Green policies in places such as New York may provide some uplift in demand or power prices. However, the continual extension of tax subsidies at the federal level is likely to continue to incentivize the addition of supply to power grids that don’t require more intermittent generation but will get it, needed or not.

Before making a decision on the value of your shares, you may want to consider the fundamentals, such as: What are prices today for new PPAs or for projects without PPAs? Is more supply being added to the grid than there are retirements? Where is demand headed? Will demand for things like electric vehicles grow nearly as quickly as new supply is added to the grid? Be aware that new technologies can be very destructive to commodity prices. Fracking was truly an energy revolution, but it also killed the natural gas market in the United States for a decade, as was predicted by Mark Papa (the brilliantly successful CEO of EOG Resources) about a decade ago.

The stumbling block for this transaction is most likely going to be the preferred shareholders – when this acquisition was initially announced, there were those that claimed they should hold out for par ($25) but even they I think are starting to realize that it is the common shareholders that got (mildly) the short end of the stick in this transaction – the value that accrued to the preferred shares should have gone to the common shareholders. Indeed, this is one of the rare times where pronouncements of “fairness” actually appears to be the case.

Atlantic Power merger arbitrage

There’s quite the spread developing on Atlantic Power’s shares and preferred shares.

A special meeting of shareholders (record date February 16, 2021, special meeting date April 7, 2021) is going to be held. The Debentures (TSX: ATP.DB.E) have their special meeting on March 18, 2021. The deal after the special meeting of shareholders should close shortly after (presumed) approval.

(NYSE: AT) – US$2.95 (US$3.03 if completed) – +2.7% or +16% annualized

The preferred shares are all in a tight range and roughly the same as well. I will use AZP.PR.A as the lead example:

(TSX: AZP.PR.A) – CAD$21.71 (CAD$22 if completed + $0.30 dividend) – same spread

The management information circular should be coming out very shortly.

Right now I’m happy to leave this as “near-cash” in my consolidated portfolio, earning a return that will not amount to be a gigantic amount in absolute terms, but percentage-wise it doesn’t make financial sense for me to bail out on it unless if I have a really compelling alternate. I’m guessing the relatively wide arbitrage spread is because most others have already bailed out and wanted to take the cash today instead of the cash in April.

Atlantic Power – Counter-bid?

Today, Atlantic Power had trades above US$3.03 (the proposed cash merger price):

At 11:04am (pacific time) somebody pumped in an order for 400k shares.

Although I have expressed my doubts at the feasibility of a counteroffer scenario, we will see. The past couple trading days saw the stock trading at a relatively high merger arbitrage (roughly 3-4% for a half year) and I was expecting this to close a little. However, trades above the US$3.02 point are highly suggestive that somebody is gambling on a superior bid coming.

I haven’t sold any of my shares since the initial merger announcement.