Category: Finance

(This was published about 6:50am PST on the day of the 2024 Presidential Election)

I have been on radio silence for the past month and a half for multiple reasons. I haven’t had much time for market introspection, but in light of today’s upcoming event that only occurs every four years, I might as well bat out some ill-informed thoughts. Just be cautioned that my investment radar in 2024 has been extremely poor (some of my disposition decisions have been outright terrible – when I look at stock quotes, it is like needles into my eyeballs), although I do have some good company with people with deeper pockets (looking somewhat enviously at Warren Buffet’s US$325 billion stack of US treasuries at Berkshire Hathaway, who’s probably equivalently pissed off of decreasing short-term interest rates).

The Covid-19 era of investing (specifically from February 2020 to sometime in 2022) was a very unique time in investing in that the playbook was being re-written in real time and we saw things that were never seen before in modern history – including the closure of global borders, economic shutdowns, broad-based stimulus of funds, negative spot oil prices, SPACs, etc. Those that were able to quickly recognize that the world was not going to end and that the world’s governments would be pumping an insane amount of liquidity into the financial marketplace were well positioned for what happened.

We are still living in the aftermath where the financial reverberations of the nuclear detonation are still being processed – albeit there is plenty of radioactive fallout that we see, how this translates into actionable decisions is another matter entirely. Politically speaking, the obvious erosion in our standard of living leads to anti-incumbent headwinds for those already in office, while the incumbents are busy engaging in gaslighting operations to tell the people how great everything is.

Shakespeare’s Macbeth has the famous line at the opening scene of “Fair is foul, foul is fair“, or perhaps the somewhat more modern phase from Orwell’s 1984 of “Freedom is slavery, War is Peace” is apt for this.

The entire financial world has been given about five months of notice that central banks will be decreasing interest rates and this gets baked into market pricing so when the rate drops actually occur, there is no reaction as the changes are anticipated. Instead, what has mystified casual observers is when the central banks started to do 0.5% decreases, the longer duration bond yields have increased.

We have been in an inverted yield curve environment for a very long time – the short end of the curve has been a good 200bps or so above the 10-year bond rate and this has now moderated to about 75bps (and will converge even further with continued short term interest rate cuts). The interest rate environment will be conducive to more “borrow at the short end of the curve and invest and harvest the spread” type investing, we also see the monetary base is continuing to expand once again:

Those entities that have the credit to be able to borrow at the floating rate and leverage it into a higher return on equity will do well. We have already seen this with REITs and other “yieldy” entities being bidded up significantly since the central banks started to signal they are decreasing interest rates.

However, the question continues to remain whether demand will follow as a result of credit availability. Borrowed money will not do very good if it cannot be recycled into activity that generates a profitable return – we are seeing pretty much every single G20 government blowing deficits and without this low-yield government spending, economies grind to a halt and political headwinds get even stronger.

This leads us to the presidential election.

Almost all “news” generated on this matter is utter propaganda. The signal-to-noise ratio is even worse in 2024 than it has been in 2020 or 2016. In fact, much of what is out there is like the equivalent of inferring information from static television. You then have automated engines converting this static into signal and then all the AI Bots out there turn it into purported real information, which is precisely the inverse of how a proper foundation of knowledge should accumulate. This deluge of non-information is spread for both sides of the partisan isles – the game is to silo people into their camps and incite as much emotional carnage on the minds of voters, just to eclipse the threshold that gets them to vote for the selection that they are told to support.

So I don’t pretend to know anything, but can only theorize the most rudimentary framework without looking at any polling, any “news”, or anything in particular. Reading the so-called “news” is damaging in this respect, just as it is when making most investment decisions.

My prediction is that Donald Trump will be elected as the 47th President of the USA. So instead of Grover Cleveland as being the only president serving non-consecutive terms, Trump will be the very rare exception to the history book. In fact, the political circumstances behind Grover Cleveland running three times for president and winning the first and third one has some interesting parallels to the current era, which I will leave as an exercise to the reader.

However, the 2024 presidential electoral result will not be universally acknowledged by the end of November 5, 2024. Indeed, there will be a good chance that it will take until December for this pronouncement to occur – especially the certification of specific state delegations to the electoral college.

There are a few reasons for my overall prediction, but the thesis boils down to some differential analysis of which devil the public is motivated to choose from. Your typical Trump voter from 2020 is still likely to choose him in 2024, but your typical Biden/Democratic voter will have found many more reasons to not support their horse primarily due to eroding economic circumstances – especially “non-elite” populations in urban cores of cities. While urban areas will still vote overwhelmingly democratic, the fraction of people motivated to turn out will shift subtly enough to make a difference in the states that matter. Finally, it is universally regarded that Kamala Harris is a worse candidate than Joe Biden (the Joe Biden of 2020, not the nearly comatose Joe Biden of 2024!) or Hillary Clinton. By virtue of Trump having run in 2016, 2020 and 2024 along with broadly consistent messaging, it creates a relatively easy “control” to compare elections with.

Please note that my political predictions do not constitute endorsements or condemnations of any candidates or parties. I am simply trying to gaze into my (foggy) crystal ball and predict an outcome. There is one easy prediction I will make, however – deficit spending. Cowardly politicians coupled with a public that makes little connection between government spending and the standard of living will continue to result in a steady erosion.

What does this mean for the markets? Less than people imagine – the low-interest rate environment playbook will continue to prevail, but the actual purchasing power of cash will continue to decline. Eventually we will get some sort of situation that will precipitate the reinstatement of quantitative easing – getting your standard 15% return on equity is going to get very difficult in these environments where asset prices will continue to skyrocket along with overall debt levels.

Finally, recall when Donald Trump was winning in the 2016 election, that on the day of the election S&P futures initially traded down about 4% until it came to the realization that Trump was all for a boosted stock market. There will likely be an inverse version of this happening in 2024 – while he is perceived to be positive to the stock market, I believe any such euphoria will be short-lived. The transition period between the election and the inauguration is likely to be very volatile.

With the US Federal Reserve imminently seeking to drop interest rates, and the Bank of Canada dropping rates a quarter point a meeting, earnings on cash are starting to decline, and all of the below will head down proportionately to the central bank rate:

(All of this assuming you can buy it at NAV)
CAD-denominated:
IBKR = 3.575% net [interest, minus CAD$13k]
HSAV.to = 3.93% net [cash, capital gains]
CASH.to = 4.02% net [cash, interest]
ZST.to = 4.34% net [6 month maturity A-AAA bond income, mixed interest, capital gains]

USD-denominated:
IBKR = 4.83% net [interest, minus US$10k]
HSUVu.to = 5.02% net [cash, capital gains]

In the Canadian market, the futures are aligned for a 25bps drop on October 23, December 11 and January 29, which will bring cash down from 5%+ to just above 3%. That will be roughly a 40% drop in income on cash in about three and half months’ time.

Needless to say all of this central bank action will be getting participants to examine the “efficient frontier” in terms of adjusting their risk-reward profiles. Instead of getting a slick 5% on risk-free cash, we will now have to explore upwards to short-term bonds, and less credit-worthy financial instruments to achieve the same amount of returns.

Unfortunately the financial markets, by virtue of future contracts, already anticipates these interest rate changes and hence anything that can provide as a substitute has already been bidded up. For example, the GoC 5 year yield from July 1st to today has gone from 3.6% to 2.8% (people will pay a premium for five years of guaranteed yield vs. a higher short-term cash yield). The Canadian preferred share market has been bidded up across the spectrum – for example, we will choose a generic preferred share, PPL.PR.O, which is trading at a 6.9% current yield and a 6.4% yield at the current GoC 5yr rate reset (essentially the risk premium is you will get an extra 3% or so for taking some duration and credit risk).

Bond-like equities also exist. Rogers Sugar (TSX: RSI) has always been one of my favourite barometers of a very stable and government-protected market in domestic sugar and their equity yields 6.4% and they pay out nearly everything in the form of dividends.

Royalties are another stable category of income. For example, Keg Royalties (TSX: KEG.un) which is a very simple income trust that takes 4% of the top-line revenues of all Keg restaurants in Canada, gives out a 7.7% distribution yield at their current payout. If you had invested in early July, this would have been a 8.7% distribution yield.

If one were to achieve a 15% return, there is nothing invest-able mentioned in this post that you can do other than to leverage up – for instance, borrow at 5% to obtain a 6.4%, 6.9% or 7.7% return – either way it is a pretty thin margin.

Needless to say, returns on risk right now are awful. Returns above the numbers presented in this post will be coming from speculative capital appreciation which makes the current environment feel more like gambling at a casino than actually investing.

There are other targets of opportunity which I have not mentioned in this post which have a little more potential, but I am still patiently waiting for a little more market stress to occur and hopefully there might be a margin call wipeout or something, just like when the Nikkei cratered 13% in one day – an event that seems to be a distant memory now.

Just saving this image for future purposes. Needless to say it looks like somebody got margin called out there.

The last two days have been quite stirring. In particular, on Friday’s trading, the volatility index spiked up to 29, which is the highest it has been since the Silicon Valley Bank debacle:

Notably, the yield curve also dived down, with the GoC 5-year going south of 3% for the first time in awhile:

There are a few lead theories that I’m thinking. In no particular order:

The “day of reckoning” of tightening interest rates is finally hitting the markets in some sort of liquidity crunch. Somebody big needed liquidity and decided to hit all the bids.

Was there somebody big that was caught short the Japanese Yen and spontaneously triggered a liquidation?

The commodity complex has also gotten hammered. For example, CNQ and CVE reported quite decent quarterly results, but their stocks have been taken down 10% since then (and WTI has dropped from US$77 to US$73 in short order).

Finally something that might be concerning is the liquidity of cash ETFs – in particular, I note that HSUV.u (the US dollar corporate class fund) in intraday trading actually was trading 0.3% below NAV in very illiquid trading (note: NAV is 111.01):

Somebody holding this fund was demanding US dollars in the middle of the trading day and simply was not getting it. This is the hallmark of liquidity issues during a market volatility event.

My gut says there is more to come, so don’t buy too early. However, I’m well positioned for something catastrophic occurring.

Today we are getting some more fear headlines out of the usual places:

The entire commodity complex was on fire earlier in the morning, but ended trading down, along with a rise in volatility.

In particular, gold got a huge bid, but ended up down for the day:

The lesson here is that the nanosecond before a crisis materializes, the only safe asset is cash. It’s not gold or Bitcoin. I don’t know if this is a correct metric or not, but one possible indicator of cash demand is the (TSX: HSAV) ETF. It is trading so much higher than NAV – rationally it doesn’t make a hell of a lot of sense.

Today’s trading action was fairly pronounced in that the commodity complex companies that have been trending from bottom-left to upper-right charts over the past month have been exhibiting whip-saw trading action. It’s as if you have a bunch of hedge fund managers taking a look at their trading screens on Friday morning and deciding this is a good time to take some chips off the table, all in unison – which seems to be the easy trade. Easy trades are most typically not correct.

There are a bunch of other firms on my watchlists, some of which have gone down sharply, that are catching my attention. Not close to buying them, but just paying more attention than I was a couple days ago. When I see synchronized price action (most of it on the downside) like today, it makes me wonder what will happen if we truly had a liquidity crisis in the markets. VIX has perked up a few percent from the previous couple weeks and if those headlines above come to fruition, coupled with other stress in the markets, might create a fertile environment for some tactical capital allocation.