What, stocks can go down too??

The jaw-boning of the central banks (every word out of the Bank of Canada and Federal Reserve are both to the tone of interest rates to rise forever) have finally had their desired impact – a suppression of demand in the asset markets, which will likely transmit itself to the overall economy, lessening inflation rates.

They’ll probably shut their mouths at some point in time when enough damage has been done. This is reminding me of the trading that occurred during the year 2000 in the Nasdaq – an incredibly volatile year, and the Federal Reserve at that time had the issue of how to withdraw its liquidity stimulus that it pumped into the market in 1999 (remember Y2K?).

Most of the technology starlings, including Shopify (TSX: SHOP), and the like are all sharply down over the past half-year. Psychologically speaking, for those that have held the stock anytime from April 2020 to today, they are now underwater. For those that bought in 2021, they are down roughly 75% on average. How much pain can they take before cutting out?

This is the challenge of investing in companies with projected cash flows in the far future – with Shopify, you have to take a shot in the dark as to when you’ll actually achieve a return on investment (i.e. the company generates positive cash flows which can be subsequently distributed to investors):

This re-rating of Shopify’s future non-earnings, coupled with the speculatively suppression of higher interest rates, clearly has had a very negative effect.

I am just picking on Shopify because it is Canadian, but this is also exhibited by all sorts of other technology darlings of the past. Today, for example, Palantir (PLTR) has been hammered 20%, on the basis of a very tepid quarterly earnings report (which more or less reported a break-even quarter which had all sorts of ‘adjustments’ to claim a positive free cash flow balance).

Don’t get me started on the effect of rising interest rates on cryptocurrency, where you’re going to have every investor on the planet realize that Bitcoin has a carrying cost (why hold onto BTC for zero yield when you can give your money to the Bank of Canada for a year and get 2.5% out of it for nothing?). You don’t hear too much about the scarcity of available Bitcoins these days! We’ll see if Michael Saylor at Microstrategy (MSTR) is forced to liquidate his stack of 129,218 Bitcoins and if so, that will be the margin call of the year for sure. One look at MSTR’s balance sheet and you do not need to be a Ph.D in corporate finance to figure out that his leverage situation is even more precarious than Elon Musk’s reliance on Tesla stock being sky-high.

In these environments, however, the best cliche used to describe things is that babies get thrown out with the bathwater. There are companies out there in the technology field which get lumped in with all of the ETF selling (go look at the holdings of ARKK here!) that do have value (beyond the obvious such as the Microsofts of the planet which will continue to have vast earnings potential due to their wide moats).

However, current free cash flows speak volumes. Companies trading under 5 times free cash flows are going to make mints for their shareholders by continued purchases of their own equity, and for those companies generating cash, shareholders should be cheering for continued lowering prices to generate excess future returns. Those that have prudently managed their balance sheets will be in a much better position to be opportunistic.

Finally, a word for those thinking that commodity investing is a one-way ride – in markets, nothing ever is! Yes, this includes Toronto residential real estate. There has been a lot of what I call ‘energy tourists’ and they have latched onto many of these stocks during earnings time (fossil fuel companies in Q1 have reported insane amounts of profits). There is an urge by many to over-trade and to shift portfolios away from quality into more speculative names (various < 50,000 boe/d with operations of more questionable characteristics) in order to torque up their return profiles. In a rising market, it is the lower quality companies that tend to exhibit the higher percentage gains, while in a flat or declining market, it is the quality firms that will have the sticking power. Stick with quality. It will let you sleep better at night in times like these, much more so than a pre-build contract for a 450 square foot Toronto condominium.

Strike while the iron is hot – Shopify

The inflated equity and debt markets are triggering companies to raise money like crazy.

Shopify priced their offering at US$1,315 (about CAD$1,650/share), and total amount raised is about CAD$1.95 billion before fees.

While my capital wouldn’t go towards Shopify, I have to commend them for taking advantage of the situation – they are diluting their shares by about 1%, and in exchange they buffer their balance sheet.

In December 2019, they held $2.5 billion in cash and equivalents. In December 2020, they held $6.4 billion. After this offering, their cash balance will go higher.

Shopify is already in positive operating income territory, but the competition is red-hot so they will need to continue to build up a war chest which will give them further stability. I wouldn’t be shocked if they continued to raise financing – they should.

There are other corporations out there, less credible, which are also raising equity and debt capital. Good on them for striking while the iron is hot.

End of year actions and rambling thoughts

Major holders of institutional money are likely on “autopilot” for Christmas so it is likely no major changes in investment policy decisions will be made until the new year, short of some geopolitical calamity.

Canadians have until December 29 to sell securities that are sitting in a loss position to claim a capital loss. Americans have until December 31st.

The real question I’m grappling with is how much more can monetary and fiscal policy continue to drag the powder keg up the hill before something breaks and it all comes tumbling down. Japan has shown the western world the way how you can run massive deficits for a very long period of time without catastrophic consequences. It might go on longer than most people think.

With the rampant speculatory valuations seen in many sectors (for two great examples, look at Peloton (PTON) and Chipotle (CMG) – yes, fast food that should be trading at over 100 times normalized earnings), there is quite clearly a degree of misallocation that hasn’t been seen in quite some time. The origins of such speculative fervor can likely in part be attributed to the supply-demand dynamics with passive indexation coupled with momentum – for example, the larger your market cap is, the more you will be included in the respective indicies. This creates price insensitive demand, and this is all too willing to be sucked up by the marketplace.

This could be the stock market equivalent of Chinese condominium towers being built in the middle of nowhere – to be sold as “stores of value” in absence of other opportunities. Maybe if you’re lucky, in a few years you can AirBnB and make a few RMB of income with it.

You can’t short them (what’s crazy can get crazier), you can’t long them (don’t know when the music will stop), all you can do is get them out of your mind. The mental return on brain damage is too low, although there is a huge gambling appeal which is witnessed by the whole locked-down millennial world discovering Robinhood and thinking they are stock-picking champions as they swap CERB money with each other, with the market makers skimming pennies a transaction. You don’t have to read me anymore, just pay attention to everything these TikTok millionaires do.

Relative performance managers that are indexed to the S&P 500 will have had to reach a +14% hurdle so far in order to justify their pay. Hypothetically, if they put their entire portfolio in Apple for the year, they’d be sitting on an 80% gain. Considering Apple is about 6% of the index, it makes you think about the other parts of the S&P that must be underperforming Apple. Something makes me think Uncle Warren B. was onto something when he ploughed nearly a hundred billion of his capital into Apple stock – it was his version of going into Bitcoin.

Managers indexed to the TSX will have seen a +3% gain this year. Your ticket to glory was Shopify, which did reasonably well during the COVID crisis, but had you held on from the beginning of the year to present, you would be up triple your original investment. My god, what do I do all this investment research for when these superior returns are just staring you so blatantly in the face?

I’ve done a cursory scan of the entire TSX on the loss side and earmarked and looked into a few issues that are of interest, but I’m not at all close to pulling the trigger on any of it.

In fact, when I look at my own portfolio, the most clearest speculative component is the one that is doing the best percentage-wise from cost. The most obviously “value” stock is not doing that well at all (you can probably take a guess which one this is).

For the past couple weeks, I have been trying to visualize how 2021 will emerge.

With infection rates, coupled with vaccinations to bring the SARS-CoV-2 episode to a close in 2021, people are going to have outlets for their money from avenues that were previously inaccessible. Travel, entertainment, socialization, etc., will continue to be demand sinks for consumer capital and this may have impact on the asset side. One big looming question is upon the restoration of the full slate of economic services available, will there be demand, especially after government stimulus programs run out? Or will there be wave, after wave, after wave, as long as central banks functionally pay for it by interest rate suppression? How long can this last?

If I were Shopify

Shopify (TSX: SHOP) is the new technological wunderkid of the TSX, following in the footsteps of Nortel, RIM, Valeant Pharmaceuticals and now SHOP. Good for them for achieving a market capitalization of $100 billion – a proud accomplishment to say the least. They deserve it.

The question is whether SHOP will retain its competitive advantage in the future. For now, things are great, but just like what happened to Nortel and Blackberry, you can lose your competitive advantages in technology more quickly than one anticipates, especially if you’re Canadian!

But what got my attention was their secondary offering where they raised US$1.3 billion (selling shares at US$700).

I should charge them for this advice, but I will offer it freely: If you can, raise more equity capital at this price. Like, try to raise $10 billion.

You’ll thank me in five years.