Category: Economics

The Government of Canada released their annual report for the 2009-2010 fiscal year (April 2009 to March 2010). The headline number is the $55.6 billion deficit.

Although the report is a pleasantly short 30 page read, I will concentrate on the expenditure side of the budget. A lot of people have the impression that federal government spending can be easily slashed. Apportioned by percentage, the $244.8 billion of expenditures look like this:

Looking at the pie chart from largest to smallest percentage expenses, one can easily see how cutting expenditures is not politically feasible. For example, a full quarter of expenses are transfers to persons. These include Old Age Security, EI payments, and child-related transfers – all three would likely have massive backlash if there was a cessation of benefits.

The government in the 1990’s, when faced with a deficit crunch (when a third of the revenues went off as interest payments) decided to cut transfer payments – this goes to the provinces mainly to pay for healthcare. Again, this would be highly unpopular if the government did so.

The discretionary expenses that the government has a chance of implementing are on defence, crown corporations, and “the rest of the government”. This is approximately 29% of the 2009-2010 fiscal expense profile. Even if you were to decrease these expenses, it would make little progress at reducing the entire expense profile, which is ballooning as the population ages.

Every Canadian should be able to understand this document, but sadly, few ever read it.

The US dollar is clearly on a downslope:

With central banks having huge incentives to devalue their currency, it is going to be a classic case of a “race to the bottom”. It is not a surprise to see commodities and gold perform in such an environment.

Canada is in an odd position – with an economy strongly aligned toward commodity prices (energy and mining), it will create strength in the dollar. Exports become less competitive on pricing, which suggests that short term interest rates will not rise because of the cooling effect of a strong currency.

In a more retail oriented environment, this will also mean that imports will be cheaper, and the most Canadian tradition of them all – cross-border shopping – will be cheaper to partake.

Mass devaluation is not quite the same as inflation, but will likely have the same result. The only question is which assets to park your cash into.

The Governor of the Bank of Canada, Mark Carney, made a speech today. Although the media is reporting otherwise, Carney is still keeping his options open:

Since the spring, the Bank has unwound the last of our exceptional liquidity measures, removed the conditional commitment, and raised the overnight rate to 1 per cent. Following these actions, financial conditions in Canada have tightened modestly but remain exceptionally stimulative. This is consistent with achieving the 2 per cent inflation target in an environment of still significant excess supply in Canada and the demand headwinds described earlier. While Canada’s circumstances and the discipline of the inflation target dictate a different policy stance than in the United States, there are limits to this divergence.

At this time of transition in the global recovery, with risks of a renewed U.S. slowdown, with constraints beginning to bind growth in emerging economies, and with domestic considerations that will slow consumption and housing activity in Canada, any further reduction in monetary policy stimulus would need to be carefully considered. The unusual uncertainty surrounding the outlook warrants caution.

Historically low policy rates, even if appropriate to achieve the inflation target, create their own risks. Aside from monetary policy, Canadian authorities will need to remain as vigilant as they have been in the past to the possibility of financial imbalances developing in an environment of still low interest rates and relative price stability.

If you read the context of the rest of the speech, essentially he is saying the economy cannot be solved with monetary policy alone, which is correct.

Also, 3-month banker’s acceptance futures (the proxy for the overnight rate projection) are not moving as a reaction to this speech.

The bond market is pricing in an upcoming deflation. Canadian 10-year benchmark yields are at around 2.8%, which is quite close to the all-time low of 2.55% reached during the pits of the economic crisis in early 2009. Although I stated previously that the next economic cycle will be inflationary, it will only be after certain conditions have been achieved – mainly the willingness of companies and consumers to spend money. Until then (which could be years away), we will not see inflation.

If this is true, then cash is likely to be a good performing asset class, if not the best asset class.

Cash is also the least “sexiest” of asset classes. It is boring. Just imagine trying to tell your colleagues that your investment portfolio is packed full of Canadian dollars. It provides a very low return (about 2%), and no possibility of appreciation. It is ironic that it might be a good asset class by virtue of other asset classes having negative returns.

Investors of government bonds will also be profiting in a deflationary environment because the government will be guaranteeing the payment of the principal – longer durations will result in larger capital gains as yields go down.

Corporate debt and other fixed income securities will fare less well simply because in deflationary environments it becomes more difficult for companies to generate cash. Debt-issuing companies will have to repay debt in nominal dollars that will have higher real value – hence, credit risk becomes a more predominant concern of the pricing of the corporate debt. For companies that have good solvency ratios (e.g. debt-to-equity and/or debt-to-free cash flows are very good), then this becomes less of a concern and corporate debt will then appreciate. But junk debt issues or corporations that are inflation-sensitive (i.e. can’t charge as much to your customers) will not be a safe haven in such an environment.

Deflation really messes with economic intuition and if market participants cannot adapt to it, there will be inefficient pricing in the markets to take advantage of if it does materialize. It would be a virtual guarantee that the Canadian real estate market would get hit badly in an economic deflation, as the prospect of paying off higher-valued debt in the future would crush prices and trump even the low interest rates that would be offered to credit-worthy customers.