Late Night Finance with Sacha – Episode 14
Date: Monday, July 5, 2021
Time: 7:30pm, Pacific Time
Duration: Projected 60 minutes.
Where: Zoom (Registration)
Frequently Asked Questions:
Q: What are you doing?
A: Second quarter, 2021 results. Will discuss various portfolio on-goings and where I see things headed forward. This is in lieu of my typical lengthy quarterly report that I write up which I no longer make publicly available. There should be some time left for Q&A, so please feel free to ask them on the zoom registration.
Q: How do I register?
A: Zoom link is here. I’ll need your city/province or state and country, and if you have any questions in advance just add it to the “Questions and Comments” part of the form. You’ll instantly receive the login to the Zoom channel.
Q: Are you trying to spam me, try to sell me garbage, etc. if I register?
A: If you register for this, I will not harvest your email or send you any solicitations. Also I am not using this to pump and dump any securities to you, although I will certainly offer opinions on what I see.
Q: Why do I have to register? I just want to be anonymous.
A: I’m curious who you are as well.
Q: If I register and don’t show up, will you be mad at me?
A: No.
Q: Will you (Sacha) be on video (i.e. this isn’t just an audio-only stream)?
A: Yes. You’ll get to see me, but the majority will be on “screen share” mode with my web browser and PDFs from SEDAR as I explain what’s going on in my mind as I present.
Q: Will I need to be on video?
A: I’d prefer it, and you are more than welcome to be in your pajamas. No judgements!
Q: Can I be a silent participant?
A: Yes. I might pick on some of you though. Bonus points if you can get your cat on camera.
Q: Is there an archive of the video I can watch later if I can’t make it?
A: No.
Q: Will there be a summary of the video?
A: A short summary will get added to the comments of this posting after the video.
Q: Will there be some other video presentation in the future?
A: Most likely, yes.
Divestor Oil and Gas Index Update, Q2-2021
Initial Post (February 5, 2021)
The Divestor Oil and Gas Index has done pretty well since inception. It is up 48.7%, compared to 43.0% for XEG and 37.3% for (the more pipeline-heavy) ZEO.
Birchcliff Energy has been the big winner in the index so far, likely due to the fact it is a pure unhedged natural gas producer, and natural gas has been on fire lately. AECO has spiked above CAD$4/GJ in the recent few days.
The underperformer has been Whitecap Resources, which is likely due to technical factors concerning the recent acquisition of TORC and NAL (which involved stock swapping). With those acquisitions, however, they will be able to increase their drilling inventory considerably for future expansion, while others on the list (the large 3) will be more constrained on growth.
Briefing note on Arch Resources
For historical context, read my December 2019 post on Arch Coal where I give a primer on coal mining and discuss Arch Coal.
This is a short briefing update on the renamed company, Arch Resources (NYSE: ARCH).
My timing from the December 2019 post was a bit botched up – indeed, at one point I exited the entire position (during the Covid crisis) but later took a very healthy position at lower prices than they are trading at today. It is a large but not gigantic position currently. I am expecting it to get larger by virtue of appreciation.
Between then and now, other than Covid-19, the other major setback they hit was the regulatory blocking of the merging of their Powder River Basin thermal coal operation with Peabody Energy. This probably cost the company tens of millions of dollars a year in synergies.
It also turned out that they engaged in poor capital allocation. They bought back way too many shares in the 2017/2018 coal boom and were forced to tuck their tails behind their backs when doing some subsequent debt and convertible debt financings to fund the $390 million Leer South Project, but it appears that path is now clear and the need for future capital is gone.
The reason for this is that the Leer South project is due to be operating in Q3-2021 and this project, at current met coal pricing, is going to make a ton of money. The project is anticipated to generate 4 million tons of High-Vol-A coking coal a year for the next couple decades.
Right this very second (partially instigated by the trade war with Australia), prices to China are around US$300/ton. Indirectly, demand from China will continue to suck supply from other suppliers of the world.
Because shipping tens of thousands of tons of material is not an easy feat, transportation logistics became a ‘weighty’ issue. There is a limited capacity to transport from an eastern inland mining area (West Virginia) to the west coast (typically Long Beach, CA), and then onto a freighter across the Pacific Ocean. The opportunities for westward export are limited (indeed, Teck is making a fortune doing this from Elk River mines in southern British Columbia). As a result, the prices that ARCH will be receiving will be well less than US$300/ton, but it will be significantly higher than the averages received in 2019-2020.
High Vol-A, from what I can tell, is around US$190 spot currently. At that price, Leer South, once completed, will contribute an incremental US$500 million or so at existing pricing to the entity, in addition to the existing metallurgical operation. This is crazy amounts of money. Also, by virtue of the entire coal industry being decimated, competitors will have to take their time to open up more met operations (looking at Warrior Met Coal (NYSE: HCC) here), so Arch will eat up the lion’s share of marginal met coal dollars.
There is a lag effect between when coal is mined and when it is sold – contracts and deliveries have to be signed quarters and years in advance, so the pricing seen on GAAP statements will not be see until well after the economic substance of such transactions is actually performed. You can sort of see this being factored in the existing share price (which is the highest it has been since the Covid crisis) but my question will be what sort of valuation the market will ascribe to the company when they generate around $15-20/share next year (current analyst estimates are $7.63). Ultimately it depends on how much this boom for steel production (the primary driver of metallurgical coal consumption) continues world-wide.
Large Cap Canadian Energy
A briefing note. I do not think any of this thinking below is original by any means, but it needs to be said.
On May 26, Suncor (TSX: SU) guided at WTIC US$60 in 2021 and US$55 in 2022 (which is presently US$68 and US$62 for the year-end contracts, respectively) a free cash flow of $7 billion. This is after a $3 billion capital expenditure in 2021.
The guidance was notable in that the 9 megabyte slide deck they provided went through great pains to downplay the amount of cash they actually were going to generate (in typical Canadian fashion, it is like they are embarrassed to admit they are making this much money), but let’s play along.
Suncor’s enterprise value is about CAD$60 billion, about $45 billion market value and $15 billion debt.
Let’s do some basic math. This is grade school finance.
It means if the company can produce cash at the present rate (which, in general, they can given the nature of what they are mining at the present capital expenditure rate), if directed to debt and equity, they will be able to pay off all their debt and repurchase their entire share stack (at current prices – it will rise over time) in 8.5 years.
This doesn’t include changes in the selling price of oil, which the above figure is currently below market.
This is a little more complicated to calculate the sensitivity to commodity pricing. Companies give out sensitivities and for every dollar on Brent (not quite WTIC, but deeply correlated), Suncor changes its funds flow through operations by about CAD$300 million. Very roughly, subtract royalties and taxes (no more tax shield, they made too much money already) and it is about CAD$200 million leftover.
I note that at current pricing, an $8 positive oil price difference over the model (note: do not confuse with the Canada/USA differential) changes the 8.5 years alluded to above into about 7 years.
You just need to make the assumption that oil pricing will stay steady.
If this is the case (or heaven forbid, oil rises even further), Suncor is ridiculously undervalued.
This doesn’t even factor in the WCS/WTIC differential, which is likely to close once Line 3 is completed (end of the year) and TMX is finished (2022?). This will be the freest money for all stakeholders involved. An extra US$5 off the differential (it is now about US$15) on Suncor’s capacity is about US$1.5 billion a year – suddenly 7 years now becomes 6 years.
Not surprisingly, the company is buying back stock like mad, probably because there isn’t anything else they can really do with the excess cash flow.
In the past couple months, they’ve bought back US$375 million in stock, 17.2 million shares (about 1.1% of the outstanding). They should aim to buy back the maximum they can at current pricing.
As this continues, the stock price will rise and make future buybacks less attractive. After the appreciation, they should jack up the dividend.
Normally businesses would also invest in capital expenditures, but in Canada, we are closed for business for any significant natural resource projects. We mine what we have left, which makes the decisions easy – harvest cash.
What is the thesis against this?
The obvious elephant in the room is the sustainability of oil pricing.
I have no doubt in 100 years from today that fossil fuel consumption, one way or another, will be seriously curtailed. It will likely be too expensive to use in most applications that we see today.
But in 8.5 years? Get real. Oil sands reserves are measured in decades.
The other obvious component of “Why are they letting me have it so cheap?” is political correctness in the form of ESG. Much demand is sapped because of this. Many institutions cannot touch oil and gas, including Berkshire Hathaway.
Eventually through buybacks and dividend payments, the market will adjust this.
The margin of safety here is extremely high and nothing comes close in the Canadian marketplace, at least to anything with over a billion dollar market cap.
The same reasoning above also applies to Canadian Natural Resources (TSX: CNQ) and Cenovus (TSX: CVE). They are also in the same boat in terms of their FCF/EV valuation, and also with similarities in their operations. Once they reduce leverage, they will be buying back stock like crazy if it is still at the current price. I don’t know how long this will last.
Sometimes things are so obvious in the markets you really wonder what the trick is, but with this, it is the closest thing I can think of picking up polymer cash notes on the street. Efficient market theory would tell me that those cash notes wouldn’t be there. Perhaps traditional finance theorists might be right, we will see. At least I can take some solace when I am at the gas station and seeing record-high prices.