Bank of Canada governor speech

Tiff Macklem gave a speech today in Halifax, trying to rationalize getting blindsided by inflation. Key quote:

At the time, we assessed that the effect of these global forces on inflation was likely to be transitory. Historical experience has taught us that supply disturbances typically have a temporary effect on inflation, so we tend to look through them. A year ago we expected inflation in goods prices to moderate as public health restrictions were eased, production ramped up and investment in global supply chain logistics picked up. In hindsight, that turned out to be overly optimistic.

I’m surprised his speechwriters haven’t sanitized the word “transitory” out of his vocabulary yet.

The forward-looking payload of his speech is on the “Inflation Expectations” sub-heading. Essentially the Bank of Canada is on a mission to target inflation expectations, rather than inflation itself because the key risk is entrenchment of expectations:

That’s why we are so focused on measures of expected inflation. We use a range of surveys and market-based measures to assess expectations of future inflation, and they show us that near-term expectations have risen. Survey results also indicate that consumers and businesses are more uncertain about future inflation and more of them expect inflation to be higher for longer. So far, longer-term inflation expectations remain reasonably well anchored, but we are acutely aware that Canadians will need to see inflation clearly coming down to sustain this confidence.

They will keep raising rates until they’ve triggered this sentiment, which is likely to happen when the labour market has transformed into one where people are grateful for employment (read: no more upward wage pressure) and the economy goes into the tank.

Until things blow up, my nominal trajectory for Canadian short-term interest rates will be:

October 26, 2022 – +0.50% to 3.75% (prime = 5.95%)
December 7, 2022 – +0.25% to 4.00% (prime = 6.2%)
January 25, 2023 – +0.25% to 4.25% (prime = 6.45%)
March 8, 2023 – +0.25% to 4.50% (prime = 6.7% – think about these variable rate mortgage holders!)

Note that the Bankers’ Acceptance futures diverge from this forecast – they expect rate hikes to stop in December.

We might see the Canadian 10-year yield get up to 375bps or so before this all ends, coupled with the Canadian dollar heading to the upper 60’s.

Recall that interest rates only started to rise on March 2, 2022. It typically takes a year for these decisions to permeate into the economy (capital expenditures cannot start and stop on a dime unlike interest rate futures).

By the end of the first quarter of 2023, things will have gone sufficiently south that people will be begging and pleading for a stop to the torture. There will obviously be a decline in discretionary demand by this point. The question is whether this will actually impact inflation expectations. I’m not so sure – expectations is also a function of public confidence and the question is whether we have seen anything to actually restore confidence – I don’t see anything on the horizon in this respect.

The litmus test is the following – say somebody handed you a stack of $10 million dollars and gave it to you a 10-year rate fixed at the current prime rate (5.45%) (which is a luxury only investment grade corporations would get at the moment). What would you do with it?

Probably most of you reading this would say “invest it in XYZ”, but say I put a future condition on the loan, which would be that you actually had to invest it in a physical capital project involving machinery and equipment and the like (and not through the construction of yet another self-storage facility either!). What would you put your money into?

16 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I think your rate hikes are a bit low. If inflation is running at 8%, would interest rates not have to go to at least 8% as well?

“We printed money and were hoping modern monetary theory will work. In hindsight, it appears that MMT is indeed a piece of crap”.

I may not know enough about MMT but I thought the idea was that when inflation rose, MMT prescribed higher taxes. That was supposed to rein back the money supply and get things back to an even keel. If so, it is still not much of a victory for MMT because it would seem to be politically impossible to impose higher tax rates at such a time πŸ™‚

While I enjoy stock picking I also set aside money for etfs and index funds. I don’t currently have a huge position in US indexes that are hedged to canadian dollars. Should the Canadian dollar get into the .60s I was thinking that would be a good time to sell out of the unhedged and into the hedged. What do people think of this strategy? This of course assumes that the cdn dollar strengthens in the future when a more pro business government gets elected.

Tiff Macklem gave a speech today in Halifax, trying to rationalize getting blindsided by inflation.”

I think this is a bit harsh. The BoC (and the Fed and …) all faced a Sophie’s choice at the onset of COVID. They all knew that their actions would drive inflation upward when COVID abated. They actually wanted that because they were trying to prevent deflation and chaos in world financial markets. They believed it would be transitory because that is what the weight of economic theory indicated.

What CBs got blindsided by was Russia’s insane invasion of Ukraine. Now the BOC needs to avoid entrenched expectations of inflation (same as the Fed). I 100% agree with you Sacha that they will not stop until this job is done.

I’d take your stack of $10M and buy discount, fixed-reset prefs. I’d collect the coupon and wait for the outrageous spreads unwind and book capital gains of 30-50% as they do so.

Ooops πŸ™‚

OK, then I’d look for small-scale (I only have $10M) grid-linked energy storage in Alberta or another province where I could arbitrage the temporal power price. It’s going to be wild for a long time as we digest the renewables investments.

Doesn’t seem so πŸ™‚

you didn’t meet Sacha’s challenge but i do like your thinking on rate resets. my understanding is that sacha would disagree, still suggested they were relatively expensive recently.

i’m seeing tax-adjusted yields for the investment grade canadian banks in the 8% range which looks pretty attractive relative to LRCN, historical and other metrics. perhaps Sacha (and others) would chime in here to express a view on rate-resets today?

Here is an example. The market is pricing Transalta 5 yr resets at a spread of 5.2% to GOC 5yr bond (ie. if TA issued a pref today, that is the reset spread that they would need to offer). There are four series of TA prefs, issued at various dates with spreads ranging from 2.03 to 3.8%.

TA is today a better credit risk than it was in the days those prefs were issued. Comparing to their peers and looking for calm to creep back into pref markets, the spread should fall. I judge that spread to be ~3% and I think we get there in the next 12-36 months (maybe sooner on very good news like an end to Putin’s regime). At 3%, TA.PR.D should trade at $21.31. It closed on Friday at $13.43.

yeah i own some TA’s and feel the same way. if rates are near here in 3.5 years the D dividend doubles! what other companies do you view the same?

i’m more looking for solid value in prefs not so much speculative (i’d be looking at common if i believed in the financials business prospects). it seems to me now the pipelines, utilities, energy are the most likely to survive recession without too much stress although high debt levels might cost the commons something

 Essentially the Bank of Canada is on a mission to target inflation expectations, rather than inflation itself because the key risk is entrenchment of expectations:”

I find this interesting. They are doing surveys to figure out inflation expectations. So now why didn’t they do surveys of recession expectations before chopping interest rates at the start of the pandemic. I seem to recall they just went ahead and did the cuts….