May 2020 – wild times

Today wraps up another month in the markets.

This quarterly report is going to shape up to be one of the most interesting since the 2008-2009 economic crisis. May was a very active trading month. Indeed, something very rare is that my usually very concentrated portfolio has been flattened like the COVID-19 curve – today I count 18 separate issuers that I own either equity or debt positions in (some more concentrated than others). There is an additional three separate positions in various futures contracts. There are more balls being juggled up in the air than ever in the history of my portfolio.

I was caught very badly with the onset of Covid-19, but just because you lose a bunch of money on the way down doesn’t mean you have to earn it back in the same manner. Things are going to be a bit more tricky in the next month – predicting correctly the nature of the post-Covid normalization is where the bulk of the money will be made.

An investor wins in the Covid-19 era by avoiding where there is less likely to be demand. Although I’m sure a few of my picks are going to be duds, the nature of what happened (culminating March 23, 2020) will result in winners that will, by the virtue of mathematics, become more concentrated, while the laggards will naturally reduce in proportion to the overall portfolio.

But overall, there is still an obvious tailwind for the market. This is taking the market sailboat that we are all on in a forward and upward direction. The wind is going to slow its gusting (i.e. central banks will soon start to normalize monetary policy), but just because the wind slows down doesn’t mean the ship stops sailing forward. There’s momentum and plenty of participants that want to convert their zero-yielding cash into assets at ever increasing prices. The winners and losers of Covid-19 are well known by this point, and institutions have their sales data to place their near-insider bets on various retail agencies. Headlines now are concerned about racism and police brutality, geopolitical and electoral politics, another sign of normalization.

Finally, here is an un-testable prediction – on Saturday at 12:22pm Pacific Time, you can watch Elon Musk’s SpaceX launch a couple astronauts into space. While this might not seem like anything special, if this launch is successful, the S&P will rise faster than the rocket that took them up into space. I’ve always thought that SpaceX and not Tesla, SolarCity, Boring or Paypal is the gem of Elon Musk, which would explain why it’s not publicly traded.

Firing on half cylinders

It has been an infinitely frustrating process when you place long orders and have them completely blown away (unfilled) by market action. Like we are not talking about missing by a dime or two, we are talking missing out by 5% gap up trades.

That said, the majority of the portfolio that has been invested in the market has caught a huge tailwind. I expect it to continue.

Remember during the 2008-2009 economic crisis where in retrospect you could just stick your fingers on a multi-year stock chart on those two years and pretty much where things ended in 2007 where were they were trading at 2011? That’s the sort of scenario I envision happening, except about as fast as it did coming down.

I always remember the cliche of that psychologically there is a feeling of regret when there is a winning trade that you always wish that more capital was deployed. Tempering that feeling is knowledge of hindsight bias – one usually never thinks about the scenario where the trade goes south.

I’m going to make an observation which may or may not come to fruition. During the CoronaCrisis, I noticed that Kitco and other physical gold vendors were having significant capacity issues which is a sign of very high retail activity. Most of the inventory was sold out or shipping delayed until well into June. My speculation is as the market and economy makes a recovery that gold will continue to lag again in favour of other commodities despite the extremely loose monetary policy. Once the S&P has peaked, it’ll probably be a better time to get into physical gold – chances are by then the Canadian dollar will also have appreciated.

Reality and the markets, weekend edition

I’ve never been asked which college/university major is best for being able to outperform in the markets, but I am guessing that those choosing to major in philosophy (specifically those specializing in epistemology) or psychology (specializing in cognition and perception) will do better than most others, especially finance and accounting (the limited academic exposure I’ve had to finance and accounting suggests to me that the education delivered in these fields still render people ill-equipped to the financial marketplace).

It is becoming increasingly difficult to separate reality and fiction with some of the media reports on various matters. It is like reading the news on the morning of April 1st, except you’re doing it every day. For example, on the trivial matter of Major League Baseball‘s planned re-opening parameters in the light of COVID-19:

Major League Baseball players will be prohibited from taking showers after games and there will be no fist-bump celebrations or spitting sunflower seeds in the dugout, according to a return-to-play guidelines drafted by league officials.

This is a clever article because it hits on what I believe is the “two realities” theme that we are seeing in COVID-19.

In markets, determining what the reality of the market is, the reality of the underlying company you’re looking at, and your own reality are essential elements to determining your standing. For example, if the market has a pessimistic reality, but the actual reality is neutral, you can ‘win’ by going long if you assuming your own read of reality is correct (coupled with a future change in perception of market reality). Knowing your own standing in regards to your perception of reality is the most difficult of these three.

The funny thing is that there is evidence that we do not need to see reality for how it actually is to survive (this is a difficult to understand lecture, but if you do understand it, you will be much better equipped to handle the financial markets than most).

Going back to Major League Baseball, the two realities that this article hits is:

1) Those that believe that the ever-tightening restrictions of activities due to COVID-19 are justified. Those reading this would be “Oh, OK. Makes sense. Showering creates aerosols, people shower in proximity with each other in stadium locker rooms, so it helps prevent the spread. We must all do our part, including Major League Baseball players.” This caters to the ‘acceptance’ crowd.

2) Another reality is “This is completely ridiculous. You expect to play outside in 35C summer heat for three hours, and not being able to shower after?? This is all about control of people through top-down bureaucratic decree, socialism, left-wing politics, etc.”. This caters to the ‘rejection’ crowd.

The ultimate irony is either reaction goes down a path of no return, where intellectually once you’ve committed the costs of reversal are high – the analogy is digging yourself deeper into a pit makes it more difficult to get out of it. Once somebody has bought into a narrative, the chances of that narrative being mentally confirmed with subsequent articles increases. Social media is very good at accelerating and filtering for these processes, which is one explanation for the increasing amount of polarization we are seeing – only for those that have bought into the ‘two reality’ trap.

Human brains are very well wired to analyze two options and make a decision. We have much less of an ability to consider scenarios with three or more options (the paradox of choice), although most of what we see before us are the consequences of multiple variables, and most of the decisions we face actually have more than two options.

Availability bias is something to always be remembered when dealing with reality sortation – are there alternative, not-before-your-eyes explanations of reality that is not being presented in front of you?

Put this into the context of the markets, where the reaction we are seeing to the markets jumping up roughly 30% from the March 23, 2020 lows is “The economy is shut down. Unemployment is well above 10%. Deficits and debts are massively increasing. Businesses are going bankrupt like never before. Why the hell is the market going up?”.

The market knows about the economy, unemployment, deficits, debt, and bankruptcies. What other variables is the market taking into consideration that people fixated on a certain number of variables cannot see?

It is nearly impossible to engage people on any basis than those of their own selected reality. It is very rare where presented evidence actually gets people to change their minds – usually such evidence ends up being reinforced into the present beliefs in a manner that is quite creative. You see this all the time in cults.

One reason why I choose to engage in the financial marketplace is because I have found no better forum that allows you to quantitatively determine the outcome of others’ perception of reality. If you get it wrong, you lose money. If you get it right, you win money. What makes it particularly challenging is in obvious certain cases reality is not at all close to what it actually is – you can still be “wrong” even when being right. A great example of this is if you shorted Tilray stock before September 19, 2018, it would have been a virtual guarantee you would have lost.

(FYI on Tilray – on September 19, 2018 it reached a high of $300 before crashing. If you had shorted the day before, the VWAP was $144, and if you had shorted just a week before the VWAP was $104 – there would have been no way you could have survived the short before September 19, 2018 except with a very small position.)

So my advice for superior performance is simple to write, but very difficult to execute in practice. Make sure not to embed yourself into a reality or narrative too deeply. Be willing to discard it, or shade it down in the face of contrary evidence. Question the veracity of the evidence. And finally, keep your sense of humour whenever you see retail cashiers behind a 2 inch thick bulletproof plexiglass wall, while seeing a fan blowing your potentially COVID-19 infected exhaled breath to the back counter.

Takes nerves of steel

In the short term, the market is designed to confuse everybody, but understanding the nature of the confusion is paramount.

Apparently in the past couple days, people have been worried “things will last longer than expected”. I have seen a bunch of stocks get dumped indiscriminately, sort of like a second wave of COVID-19 hitting the financial markets. I’m sure some of you have “felt” this mini-tremor as well. Nervous individuals that have bought shares a week ago are underwater, and are reading these headlines and are starting to panic.

This creates volatility and another round of panicked people want to reach for cash.

The problem is that any time you see a trade on the market, the cash gets exchanged from the person willing to buy the stock to the person that wants to dump the stock. The amount of cash remains the same, just that the valuation of the asset (a residual economic slice of the company in question) changes.

Maybe these people reaching for cash are satisfied with it staying around, effectively taking the cash out of circulation of the economy.

But central banks can wave a magical wand, and exchange bonds for more cash. This cash increases the pressure for demands on assets, which mostly makes its way to the stock market since this is the only game in town where you can get an income. Other routes include real estate (which doesn’t make as much income any more since rents are collapsing as we speak), or commodities (which should retain their value, and in some cases even increase in value depending on their demand). Relatively speaking, the cash becomes less significant with increased liquidity in the marketplace.

So in the medium term, this liquidity getting injected into the financial system will dampen volatility. In the short term there are going to be gyrations in accordance to the changes of participants’ psychologies, which is very rapid as the market tries to price in exactly what will be happening as a result of the COVID-19 reaction.

The cliche is that you need to sell when most participants are too bullish (there’s no incremental demand to convert cash to assets at a price higher than the assets), while the converse is true when more people are too bearish. When everybody wants cash at the same time (like during the third week in March) the result is a crash in asset prices and a huge rise in volatility. The difficult part of timing the bottom is that you have no idea when the last person (institution, pension fund, hedge fund, or a brokerage executing a margin liquidation on a poor client) that absolutely wants to convert the last of their asset into cash at any price he/she can get. You just don’t know, which is why you average when things get a little silly.

I wrote earlier sometimes it is better to be lucky than good, but yesterday evening I placed some volatility orders and they were reasonably well timed to correspond with the peak of this mini-earthquake we’ve had over the past few days (which was also instigated by the upcoming Friday being an options expiration Friday, which tends to increase volatility).

The risk-reward dynamic of the market is that if a trade feels good, it probably is a sentiment shared with others in the marketplace, and hence it is less likely to succeed than if you were very worried going into a position. And believe me, shorting VIX looks easy in retrospect but it takes nerves when you see the stock chart rocket up.

USA negative fed funds rates

I forgot to check my quotations but I see now the markets are predicting a negative short-term interest rate from the US Federal Reserve (a projected -0.06% fed funds rate for 2021):

I note that Interactive Brokers charges you -0.808% to hold CASH Euro balances over 100,000 Euro. Conversely they charge you 1.5% to borrow up to 100,000 Euro (and 1% for the next 900,000 Euro, and 0.5% for the next 149 million).

Notably, at this point, the Bank of Canada is still projected to be steady for the next two years.

However, as economic conditions deteriorate and monetary policy continues on quantitative easing forever, this might not be sustainable.

As we already have some history on European institutions (in addition to Japanese ones) in negative rate environments, there are some general guidelines as far as investment is concerned.

Although the government risk-free rate is going to be suppressed by central bank actions, the ripple effect in the non-government markets will be huge. This is playing out in asset prices right now. It’s not going to end up well for most other than the most financially nimble participants. I’d suggest throwing out the conventional playbook. While COVID-19 is not the cause of this, it definitely accelerated matters.