It is going to be very interesting to see what happens with Enbridge and Line 5.
The reason why the Federal Government cares about keeping Line 5 operational is because it processes about half of the crude oil that is refined for southern Ontario and Quebec. You can take a car to Sarnia and see the refineries.
A shutdown of Line 5 would, needless to say, be very disruptive for the region. There isn’t a good way to get additional capacity into the area – the other routes are fully utilized.
The federal government only cares about what is good for, roughly, the traditional boundaries of Upper and Lower Canada. Any policies that are tailored for areas away from this geography is strictly coincidental.
Thus, the Keystone XL cancellation was of little concern to Ottawa. The usual lip service of condemnation by politicians, when it is so obvious they don’t mean it.
I am still somewhat mystified today that the federal government bought out the Transmountain pipeline project – most people do not know that there is an existing (profitable) pipeline in place. Its existence does not matter an iota to Ottawa.
Line 5, however, is different. It fuels Ottawa’s core geography.
It was not longer than a decade ago when this strategic and political vulnerability was identified and hence the Energy East project was conceived. After the Liberals got into office in October 2015, they proceeded to kill the project with a never-ending wall of regulation.
We fast forward today and see where such lack of strategic thinking is par for the course in Canada.
It is not my job to moralize about the inadequacies of government thinking, but rather to pick out winners and losers.
I am still puzzled why so many people are in love with Enbridge as being a staple in their yield portfolios. There is far more risk than they imagined.
The sentiment will change when there is a real connection between very poor decisions and actual hardship experienced by people. The lag between the two, however, could take many, many years and attribution of blame may be misdirected.
Likewise, few lament over how much richer we could have all been, collectively as a society, had we had our act together to begin with.
Politicians, however, are not rewarded for making optimal or efficient decisions. In fact, they have a gigantic incentive to not solve problems, lest their purpose of existence be threatened.