Canadian social networking companies – Keek, Inc.

The whole investment world sees Twitter, Facebook, Linkedin, etc., and starts to wonder what the next hype is going to be as everybody gets financially envious at those who are bailing out en-masse with shares they have at a cost basis of pennies.

In Canada, the number of choices are quite limited. Most of the social media companies (at least in the English language) originate in the USA.

However, there is one Canadian firm, out of Toronto, that I know of which seems to have potential for hyped up valuations. That would be Keek, Inc. The company is attempting to be the Twitter of video. I have no idea whether this concept will take off or not, but I am reasonably sure it is something that teenagers with too much data on their mobile data plans would find creative ways to use.

In a rush to get public, they performed a reverse merger with Primary Petroleum Corporation (TSX: PIE, now TSX: KEK). This also temporarily solved another problem that they had, mainly a lack of cash.

Post reverse-merger, once all the dilution is taken into account, the entity will have about 400 million shares outstanding. This gives them a market capitalization for a company that has zero revenues and a burn rate of roughly $20 million a year given their financial statements for the six months ended August 2013.

The reverse merger will give them about a year’s worth of cash (from August 2013!) providing they can obtain some modest returns on the sale of the oil and gas assets that Primary Petroleum had. Between then and now, presumably they are going to count on their common share prices going to the roof in some sort of social media hype, where they can do a secondary offering for a bunch of cash.

Not that fundamentals matter with social networking companies, but it looks like they already their moment in the sun – the following two snapshots are from the management information circular:

Investors in Friendster probably know how this chart feels like.

I give Keek management full credit, however, for developing metrics that make utterly no sense in real life, like the following:

Wow!  The chart is going straight up!  I must invest!

Also, when digging into the documentation even further, I come up with gems such as the following paragraph:

In August 2013, Keek entered into an arm’s length lease agreement to lease approx. 17,947 sq. ft. at 1 Eglington Avenue, East (suite 300), Toronto, ON. The Lease Term was for 10 years and 3 months, commencing on July 1, 2013. Base rent for month 1 thru month 60 would be $15/sq. ft. with base rent for month 61 thru month 123 of $17/sq. ft. Keek was granted three months free rent for both base and additional rent for the first three months. Keek has recently decided that its office space requirements over the next five years are not expected to require 18,000 square feet and therefore has engaged a realtor to sublet the space while Keek look for alternative office space of approximately 5,000 square feet. There is no guarantee Keek will be able to sublet its existing space at values that approximate its current lease arrangements.

Oops!  Nothing like signing a long-term contract for a huge amount of space you suddenly discover you really didn’t need less than half a year later!

Sadly, I will not be investing in this story, but I could easily see others doing so and taking this up to a ridiculous level that is not rationally explainable by any business metrics relating to cash flow or revenues. However, if you had to spend a hundred dollars on the Lotto 6/49 with an average jackpot versus throwing it into Keek, you might actually get a better expected value on Keek, as long as you were allowed to liquidate your shares in the near-term future.

Tragically, I am indirectly invested through this via my Pinetree Capital debentures (TSX: PNP.DB), which I gave a rather cynical analysis on back in November 2013.  Pinetree owns about 52.8 million shares of Keek and if Keek goes to a hype valuation, I would hope Pinetree management would actually liquidate some shares so they can pay off their pesky debenture holders like myself.

Genworth MI – When do I cash out?

The largest component in my portfolio continues to be Genworth MI (TSX: MIC).

mic

The stock is trading at an all-time high today.

I acquired shares in July and August 2012 and have been patiently waiting. I took quite a large initial stake to begin with and I have done well by this decision, but the appreciation is getting to a point where the portfolio fraction is getting too concentrated. Unfortunately, I very much doubt mortgage insurance will be the next big hype in the financial marketplace unlike Twitter, Facebook and 3D printing! (Or if Marijuana is your thing, check out shares of Advanced Cannabis!)

A couple canary in the coal mine analogies include Equitable (TSX: EQB) and Home Capital (TSX: HCG) which interestingly enough, have not exhibited the deprecation that most mortgage REITs in the USA have. Just because this has not happened doesn’t mean it will not happen in the future – right now the economic climate in Canada is relatively stable, but this remains dependent on the commodity industries remaining solvent. I do note that the Canadian dollar has depreciated somewhat over the year, which would be supportive to Canadian real estate valuations. Also looking at the charts of EQB and HCG, it does not look like the canaries are in ill-health at all.

That said, my valuation metrics show that MIC is in the upper end of my fair value range and I have slowly start trimming my position in 2014. They’re almost at 20% above tangible book and I expect they will be booking about $3.60-3.80 EPS in 2014. I would estimate there is some upside left, but it isn’t a huge amount compared to what we have seen over the past 18 months, and it would be momentum-driven rather than any valuation-centric investors.

The recent CMHC announcement to increase mortgage premiums resulted in a nice one-time spike in the stock, but the market might not anticipate that this will have a dampening effect on demand for mortgage insurance itself. Time will tell. The other headwinds of concern is that loss ratios are at historical lows, and one wonders how much more potential unknown good news there is out there for the company.

Momentum and some potential for a catalyst-type event (especially with their huge cash hoard they have been sitting on) have kept me from hitting the sell button too quickly – historically my sales have had much worse timing than my entries. My exit will be slow and gradual and only if the common shares continue to appreciate – otherwise I am fairly satisfied at present to just clip dividend coupons and keep the capital in something other than cash, which has been increasingly difficult to deploy these days.

My only fear is simply one of greed – I can conceivably see momentum trading taking MIC far above what rational analysis would suggest is a fair value. Trimming the position, instead of eliminating it outright, is the rational way of addressing this – if they do shoot to the moon like they are a social media stock, I will have some participation.

Genworth MI up considerably after CMHC increases fees

CMHC has announced today a new fee schedule, to be effective May 1, 2014:

Loan-to-Value Ratio Standard Premium (Current) Standard Premium (Effective May 1st, 2014)
Up to and including 65% 0.50% 0.60%
Up to and including 75% 0.65% 0.75%
Up to and including 80% 1.00% 1.25%
Up to and including 85% 1.75% 1.80%
Up to and including 90% 2.00% 2.40%
Up to and including 95% 2.75% 3.15%
90.01% to 95% – Non-Traditional Down Payment 2.90% 3.35%

Assuming Genworth MI increases its fee schedule to compensate for this (which is likely), this will have the effect of increasing the company’s premiums written, which in turn will have a proportionate impact on the premium recognition as it is recognized over time. The effect on 2014 earnings will be minimal, but it will start to kick in 2015 and beyond.

At December 31, 2013, 73% of Genworth MI’s loan portfolio had a loan-to-value level of 80% or higher, so it stands to reason that they will be making a not trivial increase in this. However, one would observe that the 15% downpayment rate only will be experiencing a very minor increase in premium (1.75% to 1.80%) and chances are this “sweet spot” will lead to gains less than expected.

For the calendar year 2013, Genworth MI’s loss ratio was 25% and expense ratio was 20%. Mortgage delinquencies are quite low at present.

To those prospective homebuyers out there that want to avoid this mess: Just pay 20% down. If you have any decent credit profile, lenders will not require mortgage insurance.

Genworth MI is up about 5% as of the time of this writing.

CMHC announcement – February 28, 2014

CMHC is expected to make an announcement at 11:00am eastern time, on Friday, February 28, 2014.

The media (Globe and Mail) suspects it will be to announce that mortgage insurance premiums will be increasing.

This will have the effect giving people a disincentive to make low down payments (or use extended mortgage terms) and also conveniently allow CMHC to accrue even higher amounts of unearned premiums when they sell mortgage insurance policies.

Since the other two mortgage insurers in Canada (including Genworth MI (TSX: MIC)) mirror the CMHC rates, any increase in CMHC rates would have a proportionate impact on their top-line revenues going forward. CMHC is one of the Government of Canada’s best performing crown corporations, with a comprehensive income of $1.3 billion for the first 9 months in 2009.

The market anticipates a positive announcement, given that the pending news release was announced after the close of February 26, 2014 trading:

mic.to

Genworth MI continues to be a significant component of my portfolio so I am watching this like a hawk. I have no idea what the announcement is going to be.

My views on Genworth equity has been very well documented on this site since I took a position in them in July 2012.

Liquidating Bitcoins is not easy!

People should have seen this a mile away, but MtGox (the exchange that at one point facilitated the vast majority of Bitcoin transactions for real currency) finally packed it in and documents claimed that there was a gaping hole of about 744,408 Bitcoins due to some technical issues with the exchange software that accumulated over a couple years (not to mention a net of about US$33 million cash owed to customers!).

My hypothesis is more plausible: fraud. Anybody running an exchange operation like this would be looking at their account balances like a hawk, hourly, and have proper built-in mechanisms to ensure that there are no leaks in the system. Claiming a loss like this over a period of a couple years is simply incomprehensible.

One of the great things about how Bitcoin works is that the entire transaction ledger (the blockchain) is in public view, and some enterprising people will likely be able to reconcile what happened from publicly available data. 744,000 Bitcoins is about 6% of the entire amount in circulation.

Considering the underlying value of Bitcoin is zero, it is still amazing to see that one can still sell these things for US$500 a piece on other exchanges. This is assuming, of course, they won’t go under either.

I didn’t know how high the hype would go for Bitcoin. Guessing when the tops of markets occur is a tricky endeavour and is simply that, guesswork. My initial guess was “no higher than US$10,000 per bitcoin”, but I subsequently revised that to closer to US$900 than the $10,000 mark.

Now I’ll come with an even starker prediction: Bitcoins will never reach its all-time high (US$1,200) ever again. The hype is gone and the true weaknesses of Bitcoin have more or less been shown to make the entire system unusable except as a novelty.

Bitcoins to currency almost reminds me of what gift cards are to currency: like cash, except worse. If you truly want to invest in something that is relatively immune to the machinations of evil central bankers world-wide, this is the chart of the commodity that I think has profited the most from Bitcoin’s collapse:

gold

Right now a bitcoin is US$516 on Bitstamp (the now leading exchange for Bitcoin volume). You can get an ounce of gold for 2.6 bitcoins. An easy decision for those that still want to believe in hyper-inflationary theories.

Disclosure: No bitcoins, no gold!