Menu Foods cashes out

Menu Foods is a manufacturer of pet food. They are most famous for an incident in early 2008 where some chemical got into their food supply through imported grain from China which was tainted and caused organ failures in pets. Although they were already on the financial skids in a very low-margin industry (they cut distributions to zero in 2005), this tainted food incident took down their share price down to abysmally low levels and presented a considerable financial risk for equity holders since the company was on the brink of insolvency.

They did manage to stage a partial recovery, but then the global economic crisis hit later in 2008 and early 2009, which brought the common shares once again around the 70-90 cent range.

Investors back then, buying equity, were taking an incredible risk, but it is one that has paid off for them – although the business produces cash flows today, it is slim and they have high leverage given the amount of cash they generate. Still, an investor taking the plunge at a dollar would have seen last Friday over a triple gain on their equity investment.

Today, they will be bought out for $4.80/unit, which if I was holding units, would be selling out with a smile on my face.

I remember looking at the company back in early 2008 and thought they were going to go bankrupt. I also did not put this firm on my candidate list during the economic crisis simply because there were so many other (more solvent) offerings on the market at the time.

Another example of yield chasing

Just after a week since I posted a review of Superior Plus, declaring that they probably would have to reduce their dividends in order to be financially sustainable, they announced their quarterly results today. Notably, they lowered expectations for 2010 due to warmer weather (and therefore less natural gas deliveries).

They also had the following snippet in their quarterly release:

– The financial outlook for 2010 has been revised to AOCF per share of $1.50 to $1.65 as a result of lower than anticipated second quarter results and a weaker than previously anticipated economic recovery for the remainder of 2010.

– The financial outlook for 2011 has been revised to AOCF per share of $1.85 to $2.05 as a result of a weaker than previously anticipated economic recovery forecasted for the remainder of 2010 and throughout 2011, particularly impacting Superior’s Construction Products Distribution business.

AOCF is “Adjusted operating cash flow”, which is a non-GAAP metric to approximate how much cash before capital expenditures is available to the corporation. Since their dividend rate is $1.62/share, this leaves the company little to negative real cash to provide for acquisitions (which they have done plenty of over the past couple years), debt repayment or capital projects.

The company’s stock traded down 7.9% as a reaction to their disappointing report.

Investors undoubtedly will be looking at Superior Plus’s 13.03% dividend yield and marvel what a bargain they are getting, but it seems likely they will be forced to reduce dividends and this is reflected in the market price.

Interestingly enough, Superior Plus has four issues of debentures that trade on the TSX – the issue maturing in December 2012 has a yield to maturity of 4.5%, while the issue maturing July 2017 has a yield to maturity of 5.9%. They appear to be priced very expensive and I would not touch them.

Dividend payouts is not a reliable financial metric

I note that Manitoba Telecom, a boring but profitable firm providing telecommunication services in Manitoba, released their quarterly results today with a dividend cut – from $2.60/share to $1.70/share, paid quarterly.

With 65 million shares outstanding, this amounted to a reduction from $169M/year to $111M/year.

Given its free cash flow, which is now estimated to be around $160-190 million, this is a rational decision by management because it will give the company some room to either build up cash reserves or de-leverage from its approximate billion dollar long-term debt balance.

The market took down the common stock from $27.32/share to $24.98/share. Part of this is due to the reduction in expected earnings, but also likely due to investors bailing out on the payout cut.

The important lesson for an investor is that you cannot just look at the dividend yield and assume it will be stable – the company must be able to make enough cash, plus enough for future capital expenditures and debt repayments, in order to justify that dividend. Ultimately, the dividend itself is a metric that is should only weakly associated with the proper valuation of an equity security.

Manitoba Telecom has been on my watchlist for ages, but I still do not find any compelling value in the stock. This is another classic case of yield chasers getting burned.

BC Lower Mainland Real Estate liquidity drying up

Skimming the Greater Vancouver Real Estate, and the Fraser Valley Real Estate statistics packages, it is not surprising in the least to see volumes decline in the July month-to-month comparisons.

The reason is very simple – the introduction of the HST and the threat of higher interest rates. While HST has an impact on new homes sold, the threat of higher interest rates also pushed demand forward. Even though short term interest rates have a smaller impact on the longer-term fixed rates than most people think, it is likely that most financially unsophisticated people would think that rates (at least in the short run) are going up, so they must “lock” their purchases in today.

Usually the opposite thinking works better – the best time to buy real estate are when interest rates are high – since real estate is a credit-driven market, one would surmise that once credit becomes more expensive, real estate demand would drop and subsequently prices would have to lower in order for transactions to proceed.

If the 50% reduction in sales reported is sustained for the following year, you are bound to see price reductions as people that need liquidity in the short-term will be forced to reduce their asking prices. The people that are not urgently seeking liquidity are more likely to sit on their high asking prices and not have a transaction occur.

In terms of sheer valuation (costs vs. income potential/rent savings), Vancouver real estate is by far and away an expensive option. I’ve already explained some other intangible components to the valuation, but one major pillar of real estate has been its “safety” perception by the local populace. Once the “real estate is safe and/or never loses value” mantra disappears, you remove one of the intangible components of demand in the market.

I do not foresee a collapse in the market like we saw in certain USA markets, but a protracted period of time where the price level does not move and/or a slow downturn in prices is likely in the cards.

Rogers Sugar announces 3rd quarter results

Rogers Sugar Income Fund announced their quarterly results yesterday. The operational performance is not relevant to this post, but rather the announcement of how they will be treating their distributions after 2010 is over:

Management of Lantic and the Board of Trustees of the Fund continue to work on a plan to convert from the current income trust structure to a more conventional corporate structure. This conversion is expected to be effective as of January 1, 2011, in order to allow the current Unitholders of the Fund to maximize the benefits of the current income trust structure. The current intention is to pay quarterly dividends of approximately $0.085 per share, in order to maintain cash dividends to shareholders of the converted structure at levels that would provide an after-tax distribution equivalent to that currently enjoyed by our taxable Canadian Unitholders. The amount of dividends paid following the conversion will be at the discretion of our Board, and will be evaluated quarterly and may be revised subject to business circumstances and expected capital requirements depending on, among other things, earnings and other conditions existing from time to time.

Currently the distribution rate is $0.46/unit of interest income. At yesterday’s closing price of $4.91/unit, this translates into a 9.37% yield. A $0.085/quarter dividend translates into $0.34/year, or a 6.92% dividend rate. This is also a 26% haircut from the current payout rate. This is relatively comparable to other businesses that are publicly traded and give out dividends representing most of the free cash flow of the corporation.

The following table is a before-and-after concerning a unitholder’s after-tax distributions in British Columbia, assuming the units are held in a non-registered account, using 2010 rates (which is a critical assumption of this model, 2011 marginal rates will be slightly different due to changes in the dividend tax credit):

After-Tax Income:
Income Range Marginal Rates $0.46 $0.34
Low High Income Dividends Income Dividend Difference:
$ – $ 35,859 20.06% -12.59% $ 0.368 $0.383 (0.0151)
$ 35,859 $ 40,970 22.70% -8.79% $ 0.356 $0.370 (0.0143)
$ 40,970 $ 71,719 29.70% 1.29% $ 0.323 $0.336 (0.0122)
$ 71,719 $ 81,941 32.50% 5.32% $ 0.311 $0.322 (0.0114)
$ 81,941 $ 82,342 36.50% 11.08% $ 0.292 $0.302 (0.0102)
$ 82,342 $ 99,987 38.29% 13.66% $ 0.284 $0.294 (0.0097)
$ 99,987 $ 127,021 40.70% 17.13% $ 0.273 $0.282 (0.0090)
> $127021 43.70% 21.45% $ 0.259 $0.267 (0.0081)

As we can see, the after-tax dividend post-2011 is slightly higher than the pre-tax income distribution for all income brackets.

Also, as I have written before, anybody holding income trust units (other than REITs) in their RRSPs and TFSAs should be moving them into their non-registered accounts at the beginning of 2011.

After-Tax: After-Tax:
Income Range Marginal Rates $0.46 $0.34
Low High Income Dividends Income Dividend Difference:
$ – $ 35,859 20.06% -12.59% $ 0.368 $0.383 (0.0151)
$ 35,859 $ 40,970 22.70% -8.79% $ 0.356 $0.370 (0.0143)
$ 40,970 $ 71,719 29.70% 1.29% $ 0.323 $0.336 (0.0122)
$ 71,719 $ 81,941 32.50% 5.32% $ 0.311 $0.322 (0.0114)
$ 81,941 $ 82,342 36.50% 11.08% $ 0.292 $0.302 (0.0102)
$ 82,342 $ 99,987 38.29% 13.66% $ 0.284 $0.294 (0.0097)
$ 99,987 $ 127,021 40.70% 17.13% $ 0.273 $0.282 (0.0090)
> $127021 43.70% 21.45% $ 0.259 $0.267 (0.0081)