Canadian Finance and Economics
Finance and Economics related articles
Everybody is on holiday this week.
Thus, yesterday, when the markets went down, it was because of “traders betting on a double dip recession”. Today, the markets are up, so therefore it is because “they are betting on an economic recovery”.
It’s advisable to just not pay attention to the headlines and instead just pay attention to individual issues that might be wildly taken up or down in low volume conditions.
As 5 and 10-year yields plunge, they have had a corresponding impact on mortgage interest rates.
The best variable rates I can find are prime minus 0.75% for a 3-year variable mortgage, or prime minus 0.7% for a 5-year variable mortgage. Prime currently is 2.75%. This is still the dirt-cheap option and is preferential compared to the best available 5-year fixed rate, which is currently 3.75%.
Assuming the Bank of Canada raises rates 0.25% this September (which is not a certainty, but is a likely action) then the break-even proposition, in terms of net interest paid over a 5-year fixed period, is quite unlikely. An example of a breakeven calculation would be, on a 25-year amortization mortgage, a 0.25% rate increase every half-year in order for the 5-year fixed rate to be breakeven with the variable rate. This would correspond with a 2.5% rate increase over 5 years which seems to be unlikely given that the futures currently indicate that rates will go up by about 0.69% over the next 2.75 years.
That said, the current interest rates are historically low, and interest rates are not very predictable – it sometimes feels like one is reading tea leaves in order to get glimpses of the economic future.
As there is a real estate implication to mortgage rates, it should be noted that even though the USA has record low financing rates for mortgages, it is not sparking their real estate market.
Very little going on in the day-to-day action in the marketplace, hence very little to write about. If there was a story to write about, it would be at the extremely low yields of the US treasury market and how it continues to induce others to chase yield. Forcing people to invest in assets for income when they do not receive a fair risk-adjusted return of capital (opposed to return on capital) means making such investment decisions is a tricky endeavour.
Spot gold continues to swim at the US$1,200/Oz mark; spot crude continues to wobble between US$70 and US$85/barrel. Natural gas has been wobbling around $4.5/mmBtu, which is still quite divergent with the energy content implied with the crude contract – Natural gas has considerably lagged crude, presumably due to the implementation of cheap shale gas drilling (so-called hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking” in short).
3-month banker’s acceptance futures have also shifted slightly downward, implying less of a chance that the Bank of Canada will raise interest rates on their September 8th meeting. Three-month corporate paper is trading at a 0.91% yield. This change in the future projected rates also had the effect of taking down the Canadian dollar from roughly 97 cents to 95 cents, but this could just be white noise. The currency diversification is an interesting and separate topic, but I am happy with my mix of Canadian and US-based portfolio components.
There’s not a lot to be writing about, which gives me some time to research individual issues on my research queue. Also, since the last two weeks of August are the most heavily booked vacation days before the kids go back to school, the markets should also be relatively quiet in volume, but not necessarily price! However, at least Monday was a calm day.
I have been noticing some of my income trusts creeping up in price; if they go much higher, I might consider a partial liquidation.
After alluding to disposing of a long corporate bond position, I received some comments as to what the exact ticker is of the issue in question. There were enough hints in the post to figure out the product, but I will be more explicit in this post.
Now that I have completely disposed of the position today, the ticker in question is (NYSE: HJR). This is one (of many, many) examples of an exchange-traded structured product. The specific structure is a trust that has a single asset – corporate senior bonds of Limited Brands (6.95% coupon, maturing March 1, 2033). The trust’s mission in life is to distribute income coming out of that bond. The trust itself has $25,340,000 worth of 6.95% corporate bonds and the distribution is at a 7.00% rate.
You can read the exact specification of the trust by reading its prospectus.
Effectively you are investing in a corporate bond that is exchange-traded. The payout times are identical to the bond, with the exception of the coupon (7.00% on the trust vs. 6.95% with the corporate bond) and that trades do not incur interest expense/revenue for a purchase/sale of securities. An investor purchasing one unit of HJR will receive a $0.875 payout every March 1 and September 1 until March 2033, where they will receive a $25.875 payout.
At the current transaction price of $24.40, an investor has a 7.2% current yield on investment, or about a 7.5% yield to maturity for a 22.6 year term.
There are slightly different risks involved with the structured product. The largest change is that the structured products have a “call provision” where the unitholder, if held in sufficient quantity, can redeem the trust in exchange for the underlying bond. This call provision ensures that there is an effective cap on the unit price, even if the underlying bond trades at a premium.
There are a couple hundred of these products trading on the exchanges – some are extremely illiquid, and in the example of HJR, it is lucky to have $50,000 par value traded daily. The spread is typically 40 cents.
As I have indicated before, I have recently liquidated my entire position in HJR as I do not feel the risk/reward ratio is right for my portfolio. Other investors that are looking for a stable 7.2% yield on a senior corporate security could consider HJR. It is still a far, far more inferior option at present than buying the actual corporate debt, which is priced at around 90 cents. Since HJR is trading around 97 cents on the dollar, I am very puzzled at the high price and hence sold my position. The bid is obviously from an irrational retail source.
There are other structured products carrying the exact same bond as collateral, and they are trading at more reasonable prices. If the products were marginable, there would be an obvious arbitrage opportunity.
Exchange-traded structured products are very research-intense. Although most of them have standardized provisions, there are some that have odd-ball provisions that require you to look at the prospectus of each and every security that you are considering. Once you have cleared the research hurdle, however, they are worth looking at. In late 2008 and early 2009, these products were being thrown out the windows of financial intuitions. At the depth of the financial crisis, HJR was trading for $8.40 (33.6 cents to par) and suffice to say, I thought this was one of the greatest opportunities the market was offering especially in consideration with the risk taken (the seniority of the bond ranks you ahead of common shareholders).
Although you would have done slightly better with an equity investment at the same time, you earned your capital gain with a significantly lower level of risk, in addition to having the luxury of having a well-defined exit point (at the lastest, the maturity date). You were also being paid a handsome sum of money to wait.
In the case of HJR, and in the case of a lot of other asset-backed securities that give out a yield, it is close to the time where it is worth liquidating the positions. As the 10-year bond yield is heading toward record lows, chasing yield will become more and more dangerous.
As I indicated previously, I am interested in trimming my long-term bond positions since I believe the market for less-than-stellar debt is becoming expensive for the risk taken.
Although I am adverse to income taxes, you should never let income taxation be the overriding factor in the decision to sell – valuation should be the primary consideration, along with your portfolio considerations, and then income taxes should be a secondary consideration.
An example today was trimming a trust preferred (which held a corporate bond) position in Limited Brands (NYSE: LTD) that I have held onto since late 2008. The security is due to mature in 23 years from now (March 1, 2033) and pays a 7% coupon semi-annually. The underlying company’s equity is trading relatively high, has a moderate amount of debt ($2.6 billion debt vs. $1.2 billion cash on hand), good income ($560M in the last 12 months) and an excellent brand name. So the underlying company, in the short and medium run, is likely to be solvent and be able to raise money and retain their cash generation abilities. It would not surprise me if they were able to be solvent in 23 years to pay off the underlying debt. My cost basis on the units are 35 cents on the dollar, which represents one of the best trades I have done in some time, but this will also represent a large capital gain when liquidating.
Back then, 35 cents on the dollar meant you got to collect a 20% current yield, and another 4.5% implied capital gain by waiting patiently. Now, the market has taken all of those coupon payments and gains and transformed them into a higher unit price – so instead of waiting 20+ years to realize that money, you can do it now. What I am trying to say here is – your cost basis is irrelevant except for factoring in the cost of capital gains taxation. The current market value that you can liquidate the securities with is the relevant factor – if I have $X that I can liquidate from this security, can I deploy it elsewhere more efficiently than the implied 7.7% it is paying me?
So why trim the position? 7.7% sounds pretty good over 23 years, doesn’t it?
There are a few reasons.
– The valuation appears high. At the current trading price (94 cents on the dollar) it is significantly higher than the underlying bond’s price that is available through TRACE. At 94 cents, your current yield is 7.4%, and your implied capital gain (which is the 6 cents of appreciation you earn upon maturity) is another 0.3%, so your total yield is 7.7%. While a 7.7% yield is about 4% higher than you can get with underlying treasury bonds, it still is not a sufficient threshold.
– I want to increase my cash balances. While I believe the next big macroeconomic move in the economy will be an inflationary cycle, it will completely depend on the timing of US politics. Right now the US economy is dominated by political considerations and this is why most businesses are choosing to hoard cash – since in times of political uncertainty you do not know the return on investment. A more business-friendly administration would result in a large inflationary spike. Right now we have the exact opposite of a business-friendly administration.
– I want to shorten the duration and term of my bond portfolio, for pretty much the point I made above.
– I do not need the yield, but apparently others do. They are willing to pay for liquidity, so I am willing to give it to them for a cost – they have to meet my asking price on the exchange.
– I am afraid that interest rates, while very low by historical standards, may increase. I am also not concerned to waiting a longer period of time for those rates to rise, and get to hold onto my capital in the meantime to perhaps deploy to a better area.
– Maybe the underlying business will face a downturn. It is in the consumer fashion industry, and while the Victoria’s Secret brand is unlikely to degrade anytime soon, maybe consumers will be a little more fickle in the future. I have no clue when it comes to retail fashion which trends will stay and which will not and can only evaluate these companies from a financial perspective. A great example is Coach (NYSE: COH), which to my neanderthal male mind, mainly makes handbags and accessories. But somehow this company produces insane amounts of cash. Will this trend continue? Who knows. But what I see financially there is a cash machine. I generally ask fashion conscious women for insight on these various names once in awhile to see what the intangible aspects of the brands are.
I am giving up a further potential upside of about 6% capital appreciation (since the trust preferreds contain a call provision they will not trade much above par value) in exchange for the safety and security of cold, hard cash. Right now I do not have any targets for my cash, so I will continue to be patient. Eventually the equity markets will contract and some opportunities will present themselves. It is unlikely it will ever be like late 2008 for awhile, but we will see.