Category: Finance

If you are in a fortunate situation where you bought out-of-the-money options and then the market moved favourably in your direction to the point where the value of the underlying is at your estimate of where it should be, what do you do with your existing option position? You would have made a small fortune and there are a few options:

1. Sell the option – you will probably pay a higher spread since it is in-the-money and will be receiving less time value;
2. Sell the common, and wait for the exercise – doing this will expose you to the downside below the strike price and also give up the time value of the option;
3. Sell the common, and exercise – doing this will give up the time value.

In most cases, the best option is #4: Sell an at-the-money option.

This maximizes the time value remaining in the option. There is still downside risk, but your in-the-money option’s time value will increase at it approaches the strike price, which acts as a weak hedge.

I generally do not play with options because they are incredibly inexpensive instruments to play with (mainly spreads, but they are also commission-heavy). The few times it makes sense is always when you are receiving good value for money – in the most recent case it was something trading at a far lower volatility than it should have combined with an obviously retail order on the ask that I just had to hit. The other instance was selling high-volatility puts in instances where things couldn’t get any lower. Sometimes those automated models do offer some free money when they do so without regard of the fundamentals of the underlying stock.

The perverted effects of having a negative yield curve is finally hitting the financial markets. In particular, this is hitting the banking sector in Europe, but there is also spill-over effect in the USA as well – I had previously written about Bank of America, but this is also affecting other financial institutions.

However, I do have a general rule and that is whenever it hits the headlines of mainstream publications, it is likely closer to the 9th inning of the ballgame rather than the beginning.

I observe on the Drudge Report, which is usually ahead on things:

Once news like this starts getting on the covers of the various US magazines and such, then it is likely over.

Canadian publications are also picking up on the fact that the government bond yield curve is flat-to-inverting:

Target overnight rate: 0.5%
1 month: 0.43%
1 year: 0.42%
2 years: 0.35%
3 years: 0.35%
5 years: 0.48%
7 years: 0.79%
10 years: 1.01%

The half-point spread is a very pessimistic for the Canadian economy – people are willing to pay dearly for safety at the moment.

With government bond yields so low, investors must look elsewhere to obtain yield. This leads institutions into the wonderful world of corporate debt, and you can ask how the big 5 Canadian Banks (Royal, Scotia, CIBC, TD and BMO) are doing with all of their secured credit lines they’ve given to a lot of the oil and gas industry, in addition to their mortgage portfolios.

The Bank of Canada must be watching the sector like a hawk right now because if there is a cascade of confidence loss, things will get very ugly and very quickly. Conversely if this crisis starts to fade away, investors will be handsomely rewarded for taking the risk right now.

In the meantime, enjoy the volatility. The environment right now is once again reminding me of something like mid-2008 when everything is all panicky. Bargains that have good potential for double-digit appreciation are hitting the radar in huge frequency.

I will predict the company with a market capitalization of at least $1 billion that will exhibit the largest percentage increase in market valuation on December 22. I am pretty certain of my conviction.

Unfortunately, the company is not publicly traded. It is very likely to be publicly traded one day.

The company is called SpaceX, run by the same genius that runs Tesla Motors (Elon Musk).

Yesterday, they launched a rocket into space. They have done this before and being a private firm, this was no small feat as it was only done before by government-funded/operated space agencies.

The next step in their cost-optimization is being able to get the first stage rocket back to earth in one piece. Since the first stage probably costs around a low 3-digit million amount to construct, you would save a lot of money recovering this piece instead of having it dumped in the ocean.

They managed to do this less than 24 hours ago. Watching this video (the re-entry of the first stage rocket starts around 32 minutes in) is amazing. You can read about their initial attempts here.

My university degree was majoring in physics. I do not believe most people can appreciate how truly difficult this is to get correct.

They still have to figure out some other non-trivial matters, such as how much metal fatigue becomes a factor when reusing rockets, and how to deal with various atmospheric and variable factors that inevitably will come into play when it concerns rocketry, but for the most part, they are very well on their way to total domination of the low-cost space launch market.

After this successful re-entry, if SpaceX was publicly traded, I would guess their market capitalization would be up by 50% in a single day, which will likely top the charts on an ordinarily boring Christmas-time trading day.

Very interesting things happens to markets at bottoms and tops – there are typically panic spikes down and up.

My market instincts suggest that we’re approaching some sort of local maximum for fear in terms of the energy markets. All doom and gloom, and usually you hear about the opposite arguments (demand is rising, geopolitical risk, etc, etc.) but none of this is present.

Probably a reasonable time to shop for assets in entities that will be able to survive the trough.

Every year at around this time I scour the list of year-to-date losers because they are more prone to being jettisoned for two reasons:

1. They can crystallize a loss for income tax purposes; and
2. A fund manager does not have to be embarrassed by the presence of that security in their portfolio.

One can debate whether reason #1 or #2 is more powerful.

When looking at a very simple screen of Canadian stocks, it is evidently clear that anything energy and resource related has been disproportionately hammered. There are obvious reasons why this is the case – commodity prices – so these companies don’t require much further research. There are likely a couple golden needles to be picked out of the haystack. Those that can pick them out will be handsomely rewarded with a disproportionate out-performance whenever the underlying commodity recovers. Finding these golden needles will never be an easy process – if it was, other investors would likely be able to identify the opportunity which will impact your returns.

However, when scouring the list of non-energy and non-resource stocks, I get the following, in rank order of greatest loss year-to-date to least, with some very superficial remarks:

1. BBD.B – Bombardier – I’ve written about them in the past on this site. Their common shares are down 70% year to date! Preferred shares seem to be the sweet spot of risk/reward.
2. TTH – Transition Therapeutics – One look at their yearly stock chart can tell you when their clinical trial of their lead development candidate failed.
3. CPH – Cipher Pharmaceuticals – Will need to do some research.
4. SW – Sierra Wireless – January 1, 2015 seemed to be a peak in their stock price which is why they made this list. Perils of technology investing.
5. WIN – Wi-Lan – Patent company that is seeing the business model not be as promising as originally hoped. Not interested.
6. CJR.B – Corus Entertainment Group – Media company with various television and radio interests, facing too much internet competition.
7. TS.B – Torstar – Toronto Star. Print Media. Enough said.
8. AFN – Ag Growth International – An obscure but easy-to-analyze company selling grain equipment to farms across the world. 2015 was a fairly poor year for sales compared to 2014 and they’re going through a management transition, also distributing more cash than they are generating. They might have taken a little too much debt.
9. GVC – Glacier Media – Print Media. Enough said.
10. RET.A – Reitmans – Women’s fashion retailer. Will they go back in style? Were they ever in style? Their balance sheet is in shockingly good position ($165 million cash/marketable securities minus debt or $2.58/share!), and if the company ever learns how to make money with its marketing, the stock has very good potential. They’re not bleeding a huge amount of cash at present. I’m not smart enough to figure out whether management will figure out a winning formula – if they do, it could easily double from present prices.
11. LIQ – Liquor Stores – Razor-thin margins, coupled with acquisition-related debt, leaves an entity that makes some money but is highly susceptible to regulatory actions of the entities it operates in, coupled with their ability to maintain credit (albeit their existing facility is dirt-cheap as it is secured by an inventory that will not depreciate and can easily be liquidated – liquor!). They are paying dividends well in excess of their capacity to generate cash, so be warned that the 12% stated yield is an illusion.