When seeing a post like this, which describes somebody posting a piece of paper saying “Don’t become a mortgage slave!” on a telephone poll or plastering a “Certified Bubble Pricing!” sticker on a realtor’s sign, it makes me wonder – why do they do it?
In fact, why is real estate and gasoline prices the only real conscious items where we lament the high price, as opposed to inflated equity pricing, or inflated bond pricing (i.e. low interest rates)?
It’s likely because such commodities are heavily transparent in daily life – everybody needs a roof over their head, and many people own a car and consume gasoline.
In the case of real estate, it can also be divided into two general categories for the common person – people that do not own a place, and people that do. The people that do own are very unlikely to engage in such dialog, so it can only be assumed that people that do not own real estate take the time to do such activity.
Finally, such activity highly suggests that these people would eventually want to own, if the price is acceptable (whatever it may be). It is unlikely that somebody that has zero interest in purchasing real estate would go through such an effort.
My pondering is the following – is the goal of this person to “save” other people? Or is their goal to lessen demand in the market, causing lower prices in the marketplace?
In either case, you have to question the motives since it just seems like that if real estate in Vancouver did correct by some magnitude that the people putting up the message would be buying themselves, serving as a buffer against price decreases.
I am always fascinated by this concept of “needing to own”, when ownership is better conceptualized as “renting title from the government”. The government still has control over the land usage (through zoning), and if you want to do any significant improvements to your lot, you need approval from regulatory authorities in terms of obtaining a building permit with requisite approvals. Ownership used to mean control, but control in the modern era has been whittled down by regulations. The intangible benefits to ownership appear to be selecting which colour of paint to put on the walls and the right to own a pet, and people have to pay a very heavy premium for those rights. I can see, however, how the cultural concept of ownership has inflated the value of it.
One other constraint that most people face is the inability to invest surplus capital in products other than low-interest bearing GICs – most people have been burned by other financial products, and thus view their mortgage/home equity as an optimal investment vehicle. This is part of my argument why real estate valuation is so high in Vancouver, because of historical performance, including that relative to other financial products.