CN Rail or CP Rail – A look at the Railways

People trying to get on board the Warren Buffett bandwagon and are too cheap to purchase a Class A share of Berkshire Hathaway (currently $129,538/share) to participating in Burlington Northern are looking at other publicly traded rail options.

These include the following American names:
CSX (NYSE: CSX) – Eastern USA, competes with NSC
Kansas City Southern (NYSE: KSU) – Mid-Southern USA and both sides of Mexico
Norfolk Southern (NYSE: NSC) – Eastern USA, competes with CSX
Union Pacific (NYSE: UNP) – Primarily competes with Burlington Northern

In Canada, there are two majors:
CN Rail (TSX: CNR) – Very large network from Prince Rupert and Vancouver on the Pacific to the St. Lawrence River and Halifax to the Atlantic and New Orleans to the Gulf of Mexico.
CP Rail (TSX: CP) – From Vancouver to the St. Lawrence River.

The railways trade at roughly the same valuations – very roughly, around 16-20 times earnings, depending on the company. There are reasons for these earnings differentials, mainly balance sheet factors.

Comparing CNR and CP, CP rail appears to be a tad cheaper right now, but both are relatively expensive for what you are purchasing – a utility-type company that will continue to be very profitable in the future as energy prices increase. They will once again decrease in valuation when the physical amount of goods in the economy slows down, like things did in the second half of 2008.

Although both companies are well run and profitable, they are classic examples of such companies that you would not want to invest in unless if you wanted to invest a huge amount of money in them for the purposes of stability. Even then, one would think that waiting for the next recession would give you a better entry point.

Start of a correction or just a pause?

The uptrend in the market indexes over the past 7 months has been noted by many, but due to geopolitical instability and the rising price of crude, the uptrend has taken a break. I note before when this also happened:

I do not know whether this is the “top” or whether this is a head-fake on the way to an S&P 500 at 1400. Time will tell.

Although one day does not make for the market’s direction, crude equities fell significantly today. The long commodity trade is very crowded and whenever this condition occurs, the risk of being long becomes progressively higher – momentum can only take you so far. Prudent investors will take money off the table and be patient, and let the greedy ones get burnt.

I wish I had something more to write other than that I have been continuing to take money off the table, and also putting capital into one other obscure US-based equity position that is not listed on any index, and appears to be relatively under-valued at the moment.

Large caps appear cheaper than small caps

Just from my cursory examinations of the markets, it appears that large cap stocks are representing a better value than smaller capitalization issues. I am guessing the market is discounting some form of zero-growth projection in the future for a lot of these firms. One factor to remove from the analysis is government revenues – the theory would be that companies with higher exposure to government business will face pressure as deficits will force spending cutbacks.

Because of the currency differential, US stocks appear to be a better value at the moment – dividend-bearing companies can also be put in the RRSP to avoid withholding tax.

Just as the most basic example, Walmart (NYSE: WMT) is projected to earn about 8.5% of its capitalization this year – much better than sticking it in a 10-year government bond yielding 3.41%. You would think that the company would be able to scale its business appropriately if there was a recession – indeed, by looking at the stock chart you would be hard-pressed to see even a hint of an economic crisis in 2008-2009. You don’t even have to do any research – there is virtually no chance of Walmart not being able to produce profitable retail business in the medium-term future. This is contrasted with Amazon, which has to justify its valuation with huge amounts of growth over the next decade.

You will never see your investment in WMT rise by 30% in a year, but then again, you will not see it sink 30% either. It almost trades like a bond. It is a typical good “grandmother” stock.

There are many better (and smaller) examples of large cap companies that are trading at very attractive valuations, have a “moat”, and unlike Walmart, you could envision scenarios where they will warrant higher valuations.

When does the gravy train end?

A couple charts: One of the S&P 500 and one of the TSX Composite over the past year:

Over the past half year has been a straight trendline up. Naturally anybody that has invested in anything has seen the winds of the marketplace at their backs. The only question is – when does it end?

The economic recovery is being priced in – in addition to cash being deployed in assets that will yield any sort of return. The only question now is whether this is a rational valuation, or whether these prices have not priced in future unknowns – or perhaps the existing prices have not priced in enough of a recovery and we will continue to see a monster run continue in the indexes.