Canada – Page 38

Canadian Interest Rate Predictions

The last three weeks of market volatility have had a profound effect in driving demand for risk-free, liquid government investments. The Bank of Canada has been a recipient of some of this inflow, as demonstrated by the 5-year benchmark government bond rate:

Speculators would have made a fairly good gain had they bought around 3.1% and sold today at around 2.6%. Of course, the best trades are done in retrospect, so this is just like saying that I could have picked the last 6 digits of the lottery and won a million dollars. Whether the yield will go lower or not remains to be seen.

What this does mean, however, is that 5-year fixed rate mortgages are likely to drop from their existing levels of around 4.54% (at ING Direct) or 4.39% (a typical mortgage broker) to something down 25 basis points or so. I would expect the 5-year rate to be around 4.25% for most retail customers. I generally ignore the posted bank rates since they are always inflated and when negotiating, they usually have a standard rate that is a good percent and a bit below those rates. Competition has whittled that process down to a formality of just asking, but I am sure there are some financially uninformed people that believe the posted rate is the only one they can get.

The Bank of Canada will be raising the target (short term) rate on June 1. This is inevitable, but the question is whether they will be raising 50 basis points or 75 basis points. Right now the 3-month banker’s acceptance futures (the only short term interest futures instrument actively trading in Canada) is implying a June rate of 0.81%.

My prediction is that the Bank of Canada, on June 1st, will raise the overnight target rate 0.5% to 0.75%.

Since this is mostly baked into the markets, the effect this will have on longer-term rates is nil. However, for those that are on variable rate mortgages, they will be paying 0.5% more since the prime rate will go up a corresponding amount. On a $300,000 mortgage, this would mean $1,500/year in payments or about $125/month additional.

My projection for the end of December will be 1.5%, down from 1.75% as projected a month earlier. My prediction is that rates will go up another 0.25% on July 20, 0.25% on September 8, no change on October 19 and up 0.25% on December 7.

Canadian Interest Rate Projections – May 2010

I figure it would be helpful to see what the Canadian interest rate futures are doing and to make some projections as to what the market is saying about future rate increases:

Month / Strike	Bid Price	Ask Price	Settl. Price	Net Change	Vol.
+ 10 MA	0.000	0.000	99.375	0.000	0
+ 10 JN	99.150	99.160	99.250	-0.100	14740
+ 10 JL	0.000	0.000	99.365	0.000	0
+ 10 SE	98.730	98.740	98.820	-0.080	22075
+ 10 DE	98.340	98.350	98.410	-0.060	29381
+ 11 MR	98.050	98.060	98.100	-0.050	8873
+ 11 JN	97.740	97.770	97.810	-0.060	2777
+ 11 SE	97.440	97.480	97.550	-0.080	2076
+ 11 DE	97.220	97.270	97.310	-0.070	216
+ 12 MR	96.910	97.150	97.060	-0.250	1
+ 12 JN	96.550	96.930	96.860	0.000	0

My projection for the Bank of Canada overnight interest rate level is the following:

June 1, 2010 (+0.50% to 0.75%)
July 20, 2010 (+0.25% to 1.00%)
September 8, 2010 (+0.25% to 1.25%)
October 19, 2010 (+0.25% to 1.50%)
December 7, 2010 (+0.25% to 1.75%)

What has changed since my last projection is that the initial rate increase in June 1, 2010 will be 0.50% instead of 0.75%. I still see subsequent rate increases of 0.25% at each scheduled announcement. You can probably thank the European debt situation for this change.

Although Canada’s economy is much less linked to Europe than it is to the USA, it is enough to factor into the economic calculation. In particular, the Euro has dropped significantly and this will lessen the competitiveness of Canadian exports into the Euro market.

That said, relative to the US dollar, the Canadian dollar has slipped a little, but this probably isn’t enough to take into consideration other than “wait and see”.

Long-term rate projections, which is more relevant for mortgage pricing, has had rates drop over the past two weeks. 5-year bond rates are 2.74%, while the 10-year is at 3.47%, which is roughly the rates seen in the past three quarters. If the market stabilizes at the existing level, I would not be shocked to see a 5-year fixed mortgage rate offered at 4.00% in the next couple weeks.

A simple risk-free money procedure

This post is not to be taken seriously, but if you actually tried it, it would work.

Steps:

1. Have marginable assets (i.e. shares of widely held and liquid companies) in Interactive Brokers.
2. Withdraw cash from Interactive Brokers. For every $100 in shares you have, you will be able to borrow $70 in cash (using Canadian shares of widely held companies as an example, which allow for 30% margin). This obviously leaves zero room for a decline in equity price, so you would have to judge accordingly.
3. Observe margin rate. Currently 1.753% for the first $120,000 and 1.253% for the next $980,000.
4. Deposit cash proceeds into Ally, with a current interest rate of 2%. (Note: The risk here is that Ally would go belly-up, and CDIC only covers $100,000).
5. Whenever the margin spread goes to zero, close the transaction.
6. When it comes to tax time, remember to deduct the interest expense (margin) against the interest earned.

Assuming you had $142,857 in stocks in your account, you could conceivably pull out $100,000 cash and be able to earn an extra pre-tax $247/year, at current rates risk-free!

Obviously there is a limit to how this scales up, but you can easily see how the same procedure can apply to anything else with a higher yield. The risk you have to manage is the risk of losing principal on the investment (in this case you are investing in cash earning 2%, but in real-life scenarios people would typically invest in preferred shares or corporate debt or any other yield-bearing investment), liquidity risk (if another 9/11 happened and you were not able to sell your shares, you would be in trouble) and margin risk (making sure that you are not forced to liquidate the holdings).

Borrowing money at low rates and investing it in higher rate products is what banks and insurance companies typically do, but there is no reason why retail investors, assuming they know what they are doing, can’t get in the action as well.

Canadian Fiscal Monitor, February 2010

The government of Canada released its fiscal report for the 11 months ended February 2010, and we continue to see considerable improvement compared to last year’s results:

In the February 2009 vs. 2010 (one month) comparison:
1. Corporate income tax collections are up 31%;
2. GST collections are up 52%;
3. Other excise taxes and duties are up 22%;

Employment continues to be weak; EI payments are up 35% from the previous year. As EI benefits will only last one year, it is likely that during the same period in 2011 that this number will be lower as employment picks up.

The next month will have tentative results that I will make year-to-year comparisons with, in addition to seeing where the government was significantly off with its fiscal projections compared to the Budget 2009 document that was tabled in late January 2009.

Living off of government benefits

There is an article in the UK that describes a family with 8 young children, and the husband quitting his job because the benefits they get from the government are higher. Their take-in is about £815/week which is about £42,380/year, or about CAD$65,100 using current exchange rates.

I do not know whether the numbers are correct, and I highly suspect the article is designed to be inflammatory. I also have no idea what specific social benefits are available in the United Kingdom.

However, I have pondered what somebody in Canada or British Columbia could get if their goal is to minimize work and live off the government. I can’t think of a situation implied like the above article where you effectively have an over 100% marginal tax rate for working. There are situations that come close. There are hypothetical scenarios if your job in life is to maximize government benefits. Note the majority of these use the most current up-to-date 2010 figures, but some 2009 figures may have inadvertently slipped into the following calculations:

1. Assume you have 1 child. This will qualify you for a lot of benefits. It’s also usually better, for government benefits purposes, that you are single as having a significant other making money seriously impairs your ability the claim the benefits discussed below. If you do desire a significant other, do not marry them and live in separate accommodations will maximize the ability to obtain benefits (for you and them!). Having two children will decrease the marginal benefits received compared to having one child.

2. Earn $21,816 in the year. This will qualify you for the following PROVINCIAL benefits:
– Full MSP assistance (free for those under $22,000/year, a $1,224/year annual benefit). I am also assuming no benefit with respect to Pharmacare (which has a lower deductible for lower income individuals).
– Starting July 1, 2010, the BC HST credit (for a family under $25,000/year, a $230/year annual benefit plus $230 for dependent)
– Climate Action Dividend (for a family under $35,843/year, a $105/year benefit, plus $105/year for first child)
– BC Tax reduction credit, essentially a non-refundable reduction in the income tax rate for low income individuals (for $17,354/year, $390/year benefit, reducing by 3.2% above the limit, so in this specific example, $247.22/year benefit)
– BC Child Care Subsidy; while the requirements to qualify are not specific (they do not give a monetary threshold) this would qualify for up to a $750/month ($9000/year) subsidy for early child care. I am not factoring this in to any future calculations in this post.

You will make too much money and miss out on:
– BC Sales tax credit (for a family under $18,000/year, $75/year annual benefit, reducing by 2% above the limit) – I believe this might be phased out with the BC HST credit.

3. A $21,816 income will qualify you for the following FEDERAL benefits:
– Assuming you were working at $21,816/year before having the baby, 50 weeks of Employment Insurance benefits of $230.75/week, or $11,537/year.
– The child will enable you to receive the $100/month Universal Child Care Benefit (UCCB), which is $1,200/year until the child turns 6 years old.
– Federal GST/HST credit (up to $32,506/year income, annual credit amount $631/year with the child)
– Working Income Tax Benefit (WTIB), which is complicated to explain the actual calculation in a sentence, but for a single mother of one child making $21,816/year, works out to a refundable tax credit of $751.28/year.
– Canada Child Tax Benefit and National Child Benefit Supplement and BC Earned Income Benefit – under $23,855/year income, the benefit is $3,528.84/year.
– Canada Learning Bond (CLB), which if you open up an RESP for your child (not frequently done I am sure) will result in a $525 benefit in the RESP immediately, plus $100/year providing you qualify for the National Child Benefit Supplement.

4. Live in social housing or get rental assistance. Although it was difficult to find exact numbers to work with, apparently you can get rental assistance that will net out your rental balance to 30% of your net income. This is also why it is important to keep your income relatively low if your job is to maximize government benefits. If you earn $21,816/year, this will result in an effective rental rate of $545.40/month, which is significantly under market in Vancouver. I am going to take a gross approximation and assume $1,000/mo for a 2-bedroom apartment somewhere in Greater Vancouver which would be a subsidy of approximately $455/mo or $5,460/year.

You add all of this together and get the following results:
a. Excluding EI (which you can claim a credible argument for having paid into the program by virtue of being employed), you will receive approximately $8,252.34/year of either cash payments or payments that are otherwise mandatory that you will not be required to pay; this does not include social housing benefits, and I am excluding the RESP boost since almost nobody will be taking this option.
b. With social housing, that goes up to approximately $13,712/year.

So somebody earning $21,816/year (note: this is about $10.50/hour, full-time 40 hours/week) with a child will be receiving a subsidy of about $13,712.34. This is about 63% of their existing income level. In terms of their income statement, it would be this:

Salary – $21,816
Minus: CPP – $907
Minus: EI – $377
Minus: Income taxes – $0 (none; the child vastly increases the tax credit amounts available to the parent, plus provincial taxes are reduced to zero by the BC Tax Reduction Credit)
Net cash from work: $20,532

Add all of the following:
BC HST Credit: $460
BC Climate Action: $210
UCCB: $1200
GST/HST: $631
WTIB: $751
CCTB and supplement: $3529

Net cash after benefits: $27,313

Minus rent: $6545 (30% of income, assumed to be the “salary” in this case)

Net: $20,768

This is a good sum of money after taxes and rental. Looking at my own personal budget, assuming I had the appropriate rental subsidy as #4 above, I would actually be pulling in a mild surplus. The only real difficulty is the ability to maintain work while taking care of the child at the same time (not easy!).

Now, let’s assume that you earned $35,000/year ($16.83/hour for a 40 hour/week full-time job) as a single parent. This is the most you can earn and still be eligible for social housing benefits. This is how the math would work out:

Salary – $35,000
Minus: CPP – $1559
Minus: EI – $606
Minus: Income Taxes – $1968
Net cash from work: $30,867

We now factor in the benefits:

Minus: MSP – $1224
Add: BC Climate Action – $210
Add: UCCB – $1200
Add: GST/HST – $506
Add: CCTB and supplement – $2185

Net cash after benefits: $33,744

Minus rent: $10,500 (30% of income, assumed to be the “salary” in this case)

Net: $23,244

The difference in earning $13,184 in more pre-tax income will translate into approximately $2,476 in disposable cash after housing rental payments. While the effective marginal tax rate in these circumstances is below 100%, it is quite high (81%).

The quick conclusion that I have is that there is a high level of incentive to work part-time if you are in a middle-wage job if you are single and with a child. For example, if you are working in a clerical type job with a moderate amount of experience, the cost of having to stay at home one, two or even three days a week without pay is not that financially punishing because the government subsidies significantly make up the shortfall. Especially when you net this out with the cost of childcare, it is easy to see how people in BC that value their time more than their money would purposefully keep their income levels below the specified thresholds in order to maximize their government benefits.