The stereotypical trader – the deal with multiple screens

I noticed with amusement (courtesy of MaoXian‘s links) of some commodity trading company advertising the fact that they have cots in their offices, just in case if the market has a meltdown while sleeping – presumably they will be there to liquidate their risk.

Just in case if the link becomes broken, I will post the images:

I note with curiousity that this person’s desk has five screens, plus one screen on a notebook, plus huge billboards with coloured text display. There is enough room on the wall for a static painting depicting a trading pit. Other images of desks of “stereotypical traders”, especially those working at home, seem to concentrate on having as many flat panel displays as possible, presumably to alleviate themselves from having to get enough sunshine for the day because they can glow with the light from their screens.

I don’t know how such a setup actually improves decision-making ability. Throughout my life, I have made most of my investing decisions sitting in front of my “trusty laptop”, which has evolved from a 15.4″ screen to a 17″ screen. Most of the trades I create are done in the late evening, and I most often get up later than the 6:30am Pacific Time market opening to see what happened. My style is significantly different than trader-types: I don’t really care about the intraday charts of stocks other than just as a curiousity. I also do not sleep with my computer.

Obviously it would be stupid to be a chart-trader working off of a 10″ netbook, but there has to be a point of diminishing return before there is just simply too much screen real estate in front of you and your actual decision-making ability becomes blurred with all the junk that is presented in front of you.

There is a quote on the commodity trader’s website:

Last Friday when corn made a limit move before the sun had come up and most brokers had brewed their first pot of coffee, an entire world of million-dollar opportunities came and went. For this very reason, we’re seeing a dynamic shift in the names and faces that are most successfully monetizing these markets. And it’s tremendously gratifying to see hard workers rewarded for their efforts across a more level than ever playing field.

Making the most money you possibly can from these markets, indeed, requires a whole new level of dedication. And given the great many friends and acquaintances I’ve made after-hours on Twitter, I realize that a lot of traders are quickly discovering this reality. And they’re cashing in on it every day. Along the way, they’re lending credence to the famous quote from Elbert Hubbard: “Folks who never do any more than they get paid for, never get paid for any more than they do.”

This might be true, but do you really want your portfolio manager to wake up to an alarm generated by the computer and then having to make a snap trading decision while you’re still shaking off the cobwebs from REM sleep? For some it might work, but for me, I prefer less dramatic techniques to extract money out of the marketplace.

Why I am not investing in Japan

Quite a few sites, including Geoff Gannon, have mentioned that Japanese stocks appear to be quite a compelling value at the moment, especially in wake of the damage done by the earthquake. Another site, run by Sivaram Velauthapillai, has a breakdown of stocks that have traded in the past year, and after the earthquake. Larry Macdonald also touches upon the issue of Japanese equities.

In fact, you can simply look at the Japanese Yen currency chart and see that people have been piling into the yen, which would suggest that capital is being moved into the country at a rapid pace:

And when looking at the company in the centre of it all, Tokyo Electric Power Company (JP: 9501), they have been hacked down from about 2100 yen per share to 800 yen today – their traditional range over the past 5 years has been roughly 2000 yen to 4000 yen a share. One would think they are a compelling value without even looking at any financial statements.

I will not be investing in Japan. One of my basic investing rules is not to invest in countries that do not have English as their primary language. I very rarely make exceptions to this. The other reason is that I do not think my vantage point across the Pacific Ocean gives me any better advantage than somebody domestic – Japanese traders are just as active as well as everybody around the planet. It is very difficult, culturally, to tell what the true impact of this disaster will be in terms of domestic sentiment – you can generally only get that impression by being there.

The Japanese government also has severe issues concerning its finance and being able to maintain the standard of living of its citizens. I do not get the impression that investors have sufficiently priced in hidden risks concerning the outcome of this disaster – what if this is earthquake is the trigger to a sovereign debt crisis in Japan? Is a 200%+ debt-to-GDP ratio not low enough to have people a little skittish about giving the government another $500 billion to clean up the mess? Note that 5-year credit default swaps in Japan are now at around 1.25%!

Although looking at charts of utility companies dropping by 2/3rds may seem like there is value, I will be letting this one pass by. I am sure there is huge opportunity, but being able to dig through the necessary information to make rational investment decisions in individual equities in Japan is not something I can do. One might considering investing in an index fund, but investing in index funds is not my style of investing – it will not produce outsized gains. In fact, in the longer run, domestic Japanese consumption could be taking a bigger nose dive than what most people expect.

There is too much unknown risk, which is why I am standing on the sidelines.

The trend is clearly broken

The uptrend in the major indicies over the past six or seven months has clearly been broken. Here is a chart of the S&P 500 with my retrospective scribble on the chart, indicating the prevailing trend:

Note that volatility has increased considerably:

VIX is not predictive; however, it does say that market participants have been spooked to pricing in more volatility in the future. The question is whether they are spooked enough – my gut instinct says we may get a sucker rally here or there, but it is more likely than not that the prevailing trend will either be choppy or down – not exactly the type of environment for a buy and hold investor.

Playing conservatively is likely the better option at this point, just as it has been for the past few months.

How to deal with the black swan market event

Although the trigger of this recent trend down in the markets feels like it stemmed from the Japanese earthquake, it appeared to start with the civil unrest in Egypt.

The Nikkei today is staging a comeback – up about 6% after yesterday’s panic volatility that took the index a further 20% down before bouncing back. International traders presumably are mining their selections of Japanese equities. I will provide a list of directly (from the NYSE and NASDAQ, although Interactive Brokers clients have direct access to Japanese equity markets):

Company Name Symbol Sector
ADVANTEST CORP ATE Electronic Technology
CANON INC CAJ Electronic Technology
HITACHI LTD HIT Producer Manufacturing
HONDA MOTOR CO LTD HMC Consumer Durables
INTERNET INITIATIVE JAPAN INC IIJI Technology Services
KONAMI CORP KNM Consumer Durables
KUBOTA CORP KUB Producer Manufacturing
KYOCERA CORP KYO Electronic Technology
MAKITA CORP MKTAY Consumer Durables
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP INC MTU Finance
MITSUI & CO LTD MITSY Distribution Services
MIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP INC MFG Finance
NIDEC CORP NJ Producer Manufacturing
NIPPON TELEGRAPH & TELEPHONE CORP NTT Communications
NOMURA HOLDINGS INC NMR Finance
NTT DOCOMO INC DCM Communications
ORIX CORP IX Finance
PANASONIC CORP PC Electronic Technology
SONY CORP SNE Consumer Durables
SUMITOMO MITSUI FINANCIAL GROUP INC SMFG Finance
TOYOTA MOTOR CORP TM Consumer Durables
WACOAL HOLDINGS CORP WACLY Consumer Non-Durables

Very quickly mining the selections above (which generally represent global large-capitalized Japanese companies), Kyocera appears to have decent value, with similar valuations to the old-school technology index.

However, investors should be cautioned that they are not nearly out of the woods yet – the civil disruptions in Northern Africa and the Japanese earthquake could be the trigger to a prolonged downslide in the markets. It is very difficult to determine whether now, a moment of relative uncertainty, is a good time to jump in, or whether the markets will reward the patient.

I’m choosing to be patient. My portfolio has been extremely defensive and I continue to wait with a large amount of cash and cash-like instruments that are uncorrelated to the woes of the equity marketplace.

Some might argue that the damage has all been priced in – my guess is that there will be damage to the market beyond the immediate economic impacts of geopolitical uncertainty and natural disasters that we have seen over the past month.

Quick review of some large cap technology stocks

I am continuing to look at the US large cap sector, just for personal review rather than serious consideration. I am continued to be surprised by relatively good valuations, around the 10% yield levels. Most of these are in the first-generation “old-school” technology sector. Very well-known companies include the following, with some very anecdotal remarks on my behalf:

Microsoft (MSFT) – Trading at 9.3x FY2012 projected earnings, with $30B net cash on balance sheet, Windows/Office empire continued to be chipped away at with competition;
Intel (INTC) – Trading at 9.5x FY2012 projected earnings, $20B net cash on balance sheet, likely to be around for a long time, competition in mobile processors, but nothing in really ‘large scale’ CPUs except AMD;
Dell (DELL) – Trading at 8.6x FY2012 projected earnings, $8B net cash, well-known customer support/service issues, but otherwise entrenched in computer/IT market;
Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) – Trading at 7.3x FY2012 projected earnings, $10B net debt, along with Dell, entrenched in computer/IT market;
Lexmark (LMK) – Trading at 7.7x FY2012 projected earnings, $600M net cash, major supplier in printer/imaging market;
Xerox (XRX) – Trading at 8.3x FY2012 projected earnings, $8B net debt, in a similar domain as Lexmark;
Seagate (STX) – Trading at 7.2x FY2012 projected earnings, $0 net cash/debt, hard drive/storage manufacturer;
Western Digital (WDC) – Trading at 9.3x FY2012 projected earnings, $3B net cash, in a similar domain as Seagate;
Micron Technology (MU) – Trading at 8.4x FY2012 projected earnings, $600M net cash, memory manufacturer;

One would think that diversifying a position into these nine companies and calling it the “Old-school technology fund” would probably be considered a relatively safe alternative over the next 10 years, compared to the 3.4% you would achieve with a 10-year US treasury bond.

My gut instinct would suggest that these companies would still be around in 10 years, especially Intel, which has the biggest competitive advantage out of the nine listed above.

I am also assuming that smarter eyeballs than my own have looked at these companies, which is why I suspect there isn’t much extraordinary value here other than receiving a nominal 10% return on equity, which is pretty good for zero research.