<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Market timing is half luck, half skill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://divestor.com/2010/01/20/market-timing-is-half-luck-half-skill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://divestor.com/2010/01/20/market-timing-is-half-luck-half-skill/</link>
	<description>Canadian Finance, Economics and Securities Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 13:34:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trading credit principal for quality &#8211; TFSA update - Divestor</title>
		<link>http://divestor.com/2010/01/20/market-timing-is-half-luck-half-skill/comment-page-1/#comment-5127</link>
		<dc:creator>Trading credit principal for quality &#8211; TFSA update - Divestor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divestor.com/?p=3364#comment-5127</guid>
		<description>[...] one of my lesser performing investments, due to a horrible entry point (the company announced some adverse news shortly after my investment), which I had an opportunity to see the writing on the wall and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] one of my lesser performing investments, due to a horrible entry point (the company announced some adverse news shortly after my investment), which I had an opportunity to see the writing on the wall and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sacha Peter</title>
		<link>http://divestor.com/2010/01/20/market-timing-is-half-luck-half-skill/comment-page-1/#comment-3366</link>
		<dc:creator>Sacha Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divestor.com/?p=3364#comment-3366</guid>
		<description>I did look at SSI, but they appear to be more riskier at their present price.  For one thing, SSI can&#039;t easily equitize their debt by virtue of having such a tiny market capitalization.

You&#039;ll have to read the terms of the debenture offering and/or the annual report to figure out the seniority order, but capital leases are not usually secured by anything other than whatever is being leased itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did look at SSI, but they appear to be more riskier at their present price.  For one thing, SSI can&#8217;t easily equitize their debt by virtue of having such a tiny market capitalization.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll have to read the terms of the debenture offering and/or the annual report to figure out the seniority order, but capital leases are not usually secured by anything other than whatever is being leased itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://divestor.com/2010/01/20/market-timing-is-half-luck-half-skill/comment-page-1/#comment-3365</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://divestor.com/?p=3364#comment-3365</guid>
		<description>I wonder how you&#039;d compare First Uranium debt with ssi.db. At todays bid it offers a coupon of 8.6% and around 10% appreciation till term end.

They are convertible and unsecured which doesn&#039;t sound as safe? Sterling also has lease commitments which are substantial in the coming years. Any idea the heirarchy of whose paid first in a liquidation? 

My guess is?

Current liablities 
Convertible debt holders
Lease holders
Common

All this assuming of course that they also assuming they can actually get close to $40 million for the inventory they have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how you&#8217;d compare First Uranium debt with ssi.db. At todays bid it offers a coupon of 8.6% and around 10% appreciation till term end.</p>
<p>They are convertible and unsecured which doesn&#8217;t sound as safe? Sterling also has lease commitments which are substantial in the coming years. Any idea the heirarchy of whose paid first in a liquidation? </p>
<p>My guess is?</p>
<p>Current liablities<br />
Convertible debt holders<br />
Lease holders<br />
Common</p>
<p>All this assuming of course that they also assuming they can actually get close to $40 million for the inventory they have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

