Yellow Pages – Float shrinks even further

Today on SEDAR, Empyrean Capital Partners disclosed a purchase of shares in Yellow Pages (TSX: Y) and their holdings are now 5.64 million shares, which is up approximately 677,000 shares from their previous disclosure (which was nearly two years ago).

Combined with the 63,750 shares that Yellow has repurchased in the month of August, this means the public float not held by the 10% owners is approximately 6.39 million shares, or about 23% of the shares outstanding.

The massive short position that was in the company last year has nearly exited the position – short interest is about 18,500 shares. This is unfortunate, as I rather enjoyed receiving an extra 10% yield on my shares as they were periodically being lent out for short sellers.

With the amount of cash flow they are able to generate, they will be paying the entirety of their convertible debentures (TSX: YPG.DB) on May 31, 2021, if the stock price is not above the conversion price ($19.04/share) at that time. After paying off the debt (or having it converted), I would view it more probable than not that the dividend and/or buybacks will increase significantly from the current quarterly 11 cents per share. I’m quite surprised the rest of the float hasn’t been taken private – I’d guess a lowball offer around $15-16 is incoming. When you consider the company has generated more than $4/share in cash in the past four quarters, this actually seems low.

Option selling

Probably due to Robinhood, retail investors are getting into the business of option selling. Almost nobody in the retail scope should be doing this. The new professed method to riches has been selling put spreads (likely due to the fact that margin requirements for spreads are lower than flat-out selling naked puts). Robinhood loves people engaging in these strategies since they make far more per trade. Put spread selling appears to have been, at least to the end of August, a viable manner of making untold amounts of gains as they are the recipient of both price appreciation and time decay (theta).

In fact, since early June, it would have been near-impossible to lose money employing such a strategy, which is why in the month of August, you probably had hordes of people self-educating each other on the virtues of selling put spreads for a limited risk method to making free money. Free money!

The issue with put selling is that when it works you make a little (especially in relation to what you could have made had you just bought the common stock directly), but when the trade goes against you, you lose a ton of money. Many retail investors fail to calculate their risk exposure, especially in market environments in the past few days where not only do you lose on price (the delta skyrockets) but also volatility (which inflates the price of a short position and makes it much more expensive to cover).

Now the tide has turned and people are finally seeing that such strategies can make a thousand dollars a week, but lose you ten grand in a day when you bet incorrectly.

Just reading the reddit group /r/thetagang, it’s pretty apparent that a lot of people viewed this as a low-capital perpetual money making machine, at least until now. The quantitative algorithms that take the other side of these option trades, for the most part, have basically won to a degree more than one would at a casino playing a reasonably fair game of blackjack.

What, markets don’t go up 30% a month forever?

I’m going to use Tesla as the standard, but you can pretty much use whatever high-flying technology sector stock as a substitute (e.g. Zoom):

Some basic math – from August 11 to August 31, Telsa went from $280/share to $500/share.

It is really a shame that Robinhood removed their customer stock holding information since it is very illustrative what the retail momentum crowd is chasing. Just imagine seeing this chart, and on August 26th or 27th you finally capitulate and say I’m going in. You buy shares at $420 level (remember that number? Pre-split!), and on August 28 and after the weekend you are looking like a genius, up about 20% on your investment in a week. Now this is how you become a millionaire!

Fast forward a week in the markets, and suddenly your $420/share purchase is now sitting at a 15% loss from the cost. How much further down does this go before you capitulate, dump your shares, and then swear off gambling on these popular technology stocks?

This sort of thing happened in 1999-2000 all the time.

One of the few differences is that treating the stock market as a casino is even easier than ever. The emotions associated with gains and losses are all the same.

Another difference is that after the Y2K scare passed without any consequences, Alan Greenspan applied the monetary brake pedals (do you remember the days when interest rates were above zero?) and it was one of the contributors to the crash in March of 2000. This crash was preceded by an incredible amount of volatility in February 2000. Right now, gasoline is still being poured onto the fire in the form of fiscal stimulus and interest rate curve control.

I’d be curious what the average retail holding period of Tesla stock was in the past month. I’d guess a week or two at most.

Since there was likely much more broad participation in this upswing since June (the realization that markets are effectively decoupled from the economy), in order to make a check on the upward momentum requires a much more violent downswing. As the chart of Tesla above can attest to, this was a pretty violent downturn, and will shake out people that think the stock market was a one-way street to riches.

In the short term, if a trade feels comfortable to make, it probably is a losing one.

TSX Debenture Sheet Update

A few days ago, TSX Money has changed their website interface (in my opinion the change is awful for desktop users compared to the previous version). Before it used to be my go-to to get a quick quotation or the most recent news, but now everything is so spaced out and shows a lot more irrelevant information that I’m looking for alternatives. Why do providers always mess up a good thing? You get what you pay for I guess!

The best example of non-changing interfaces with incremental improvement are sites like Craigslist or Secinfo. They know major interface changes turn off users.

In regards to the TSX Debenture sheet I maintained, it broke the quote retrieval system I was using. Previously, the code to recover near real-time quotes was kindly provided by a user of the sheet which I was more than happy to implement (it involved importing the data from the TMX website). My first attempt to this weekend to re-establish this (realize that my mad hacking skills are about 20 years out of date) consumed a couple hours of time with little headway. I’m guessing one of you out there is smart enough to give me a proper =importxml(…) routine that will magically work.

Thank you.

(Update: A very, very, very intelligent person from Japan (you know who you are…) was kind enough to render assistance on this. Things look to be operational again, but we’ll find out when the market opens again on Tuesday!)

Hiccups in the broader markets

The S&P has more or less been on an uphill trend for the past 3 months. The last major incursion to the prevailing market trend was in June, which shook out the people with low amounts of conviction. Since then, the people that have cashed up during Covid (“let’s wait for a vaccine”, “let’s wait for case rates to go to zero”, “let’s wait for the presidential election to conclude”), etc. have been staring at stock charts of companies like Tesla, Microsoft, Zoom, etc., all rising in price. During the three month process, the temptation to buy becomes too much (“let’s board the train”), and that also starts attracting unsophisticated retail investors (Robinhood traders) into the mix.

There is still a lot of cash on the sidelines, and there is still a lot of pessimism out there in regards to Covid and the general state of the economy, so this cash will be the ultimate backstop to the markets.

However, once in awhile, the markets need to exhibit a “shake-out”, where confidence is obviously lost, and the sentiment turns short-term negative, such as the moment we got yesterday and today – what’s happening is that equity holders with less conviction are taking gains and this creates its own stampede of people that have decided that taking gains on the past three months of performance is “good enough”.

Note I haven’t mentioned a thing about valuation in this post. Of course companies like Apple, Microsoft, etc., are trading at elevated ratios. Where else are you going to stick your capital, 30-year US treasury bonds yielding 1.4%? Of course companies like Zoom and Tesla are over-valued, but over-valuation alone is not a sufficient condition for going all negative on the S&P 500. Indeed, if the entire S&P 500 index were to collapse 25% in the next week (without a corresponding change in interest rates), you’d have the media shouting about how everything is going to hell, but privately within the halls of pension funds and institutions, would be a pretty good chance to deploy cash into equities.

The underbelly of the high profile, high-PE, high capitalization stocks still shows a market that is relatively stable and doesn’t appear excessive.

I’m guessing this hiccup will be a two week ordeal, especially when combined with presidential election antics. Panicked hands will bail, and when they’re finished, we’ll begin the slow march up against the wall of worry.

Indeed, the implied volatility of the S&P 500 has spiked, where the short term contract (mid-September expiry) is hovering around the 35% mark, while the October contract is at 40%. This massive diversion is due to the anticipated effects of the US presidential election on equity markets.

In general, I would be a seller of volatility going into the election.

Finally, this is not to say there will be economic headwinds that will cause issues in the marketplace. But this is going to be a 2021 story, not 2020. All of this nearly free money provided through quantitative easing, central bank asset purchases, and the provision of massive government fiscal deficits will have consequences. The analogy is that the shot of meth has been given to the patient and the patient has been feeling really good. But this high only lasts for so long before you either have to pump up the patient again, or let the patient sober up.