What to do with RRSP and TFSA contributions

I notice Larry Macdonald is tackling the age-old question of where to put cash into work. This would be cash that is earmarked for an RRSP and/or TFSA contribution.

The sensible answer is that you don’t have to contribute and instead concentrate on debt reduction. Many people have a mortgage accruing interest at 4%, and assuming your marginal tax rate is 30%, it would amount to an equivalent pre-tax investment at 5.7%, not bad on what amounts to a risk-free return.

If you are fortunate enough to have no debts to pay off, then the question becomes more difficult to answer.

I would agree with the sentiment that the marketplace feels “frothy”, albeit equities are likely poised for further gains early this year.

The worst decision somebody can make is to contribute cash and put it immediately to work in an investment without regard to the valuation of the investment. For example, dumping the money into an ETF (which is what most casual investors will do) is unlikely to produce a market-beating return unless you can explicitly justify why the ETF components are undervalued.

This question is amplified for myself, mainly because I have been on a liquidation spree at the beginning of this year. It hurts to see cash earning 2%, but it would hurt even more to see that cash earn -10% on a snap decision investment. All I can do at present is pile stocks up in my research queue, and be patient for valuations to correct themselves or to wait for a volatility shock in the marketplace.

It is for this reason, high levels of cash, that I am not terribly optimistic about my 2011 performance.

Davis and Henderson fooling all sorts of investors

The award for the “most botched up trust conversion of the year” would have to go to none other than Davis + Henderson. This is ironic since they are a business service company that would presumably include assistance with such things as income trust conversions.

Previously their ticker symbol was DHF.UN (on Toronto), but they changed their ticker to “DH.TO” upon conversion.

An additional mixup is that DHF.TO traded 104,000 shares on January 4, 2011 under the wrong ticker symbol.

It is most likely that somebody botched up the paperwork because most electronic systems still have a listing for “DHF.TO”, which is not the proper symbol and is not trading. The correct symbol, “DH.TO“, is listed on the TSX but has had negligible volume because almost everybody’s electronic systems (including Interactive Brokers!) have the improper DHF.TO ticker.

Disclosure: I currently have a position in Davis + Henderson.

A Questrade failure

Questrade is still not ready for “prime time” for serious investors – I notice that with the slew of income trust conversions today that most of them are trading with new ticker symbols.

In one of my portfolios held with Questrade, I own some previous trust units that have converted into a corporation. I notice the market is moving in a favourable position and I wish to liquidate some shares. I enter in the new ticker symbol, and the following information comes up:

Date of Order: 01/04/2011
Time of Order: XX:XX:XX EDT
Status of order: Rejected
Order Id: XXXXXXXXXXX
Notes: The client does not have any positions in this stock

I note that Interactive Brokers does not have the same problem. Their system handled the transition perfectly.

Although this system issue is unlikely to cost me money, what if there had been a market event that I wanted to swiftly liquidate my positions into?

Their customer service mentioned the following:

Once we receive the new symbols from your clearinghouse, we will update your position. This process generally takes about 5-7 business days to update. If your intention is to trade this stock before that time, please contact our trade desk at 1-888-783-7866.

Although Questrade continues to be a good low cost alternative, it has lingering issues like these that cause me to be very wary of sole-sourcing them for my investments.

(Update, January 6, 2011): I actually called the 1-888 line and reached their trading desk. They said I could not sell the units/shares until the symbol change is recognized by the system. Not thrilled about this at all.

A Happy New Year

The Canadian markets are still celebrating their holidays and the TSX is closed on Monday.

Posting will resume then, along with the year-end update and predictions for 2011.

It is always good to take a refresher away from research. Keeping your mental batteries charged throughout the year is just as important as making good investment decisions – one leads to the other.

End of year decision-making

Posting will continue to be light in the final couple weeks of the year. Part of the luxury of not having to be forced to deploy capital is that I can be patient, and this time of year is usually a good time to do anything other than work-related work!

I did manage to unload a few more debentures of a very poorly performing corporation that I have written about in the recent past; this is purely about mitigating potential credit risk in 2011.

Also, I have been investigating the potential usage of cheap leverage given that it is unlikely Canada will be increasing its short term rates soon. This kind of notion is unfortunately a year too late, but there are still options available that would seemingly yield some fairly low-risk return on investment.

Bank of Canada – Wait and see

As widely anticipated, the Bank of Canada has held the short term interest rate to be steady at 1%. The official statement has the following salient paragraphs:

The global economic recovery is proceeding largely as expected, although risks have increased. As anticipated, private domestic demand in the United States is picking up slowly, while growth in emerging-market economies has begun to ease to a more sustainable, but still robust, pace. In Europe, recent data have been consistent with a modest recovery. At the same time, there is an increased risk that sovereign debt concerns in several countries could trigger renewed strains in global financial markets.

The recovery in Canada is proceeding at a moderate pace, although economic activity in the second half of 2010 appears slightly weaker than the Bank projected in its October Monetary Policy Report. In the third quarter, household spending was stronger than the Bank had anticipated and growth in business investment was robust. However, net exports were weaker than projected and continued to exert a significant drag on growth. This underlines a previously-identified risk that a combination of disappointing productivity performance and persistent strength in the Canadian dollar could dampen the expected recovery of net exports.

The translation to this is simply: “We’re waiting and watching”. The other note is that the elevated value of the Canadian currency, while great for all of us consumers that purchase imported goods, is damaging the economic prospects of exporting companies.

Bank of Canada – Interest Rates

One event coming this week is the December 7 scheduled announcement of the Bank of Canada overnight target rate. It is currently 1% and it is widely expected that it will remain at 1% given the impact of economic news (i.e. growth is moderating from the economic crisis, and that the high Canadian dollar is impairing growth).

Some are even criticizing the decision to raise rates from 0.25% to 1%, but it is important to note that a short term bank rate of 0.25% introduces more risk to the financial system than a slightly higher rate – although banks are trying their hardest to find credit-worthy entities to loan money to (since money is still very cheap at 1%), there is less of an impulse to doing so than at a 0.25% rate.

You will still get the usual yield-chasing as people continually try to earn a return on their capital. The consideration to ensure the return of capital continues to be secondary.

Reports of food price inflation

I am starting to read more about food price inflation – this makes logical sense when you consider that base commodities such as grain have been rising significantly.

One of Canada’s major grocery retailers, Loblaw Companies (operating Superstore), reported their third quarter results and notably stated the following:

- the Company’s internal retail food price index was flat. This compared to internal retail food price inflation in the third quarter of 2009;

My anecdotal evidence would suggest that food prices are increasing, but at least not according to Loblaw, which has less of an incentive to lie about this than the government statistics.

Short term Bank of Canada rate snapshot

BAX futures suggest that the overnight target rate will be held at 1% for the December 7, 2010 Bank of Canada meeting:

Month / Strike Bid Price Ask Price Settl. Price Net Change Vol.
+ 10 NO 0.000 0.000 98.690 0.000 0
+ 10 DE 98.710 98.715 98.710 0.000 4741
+ 11 JA 0.000 0.000 98.675 0.000 0
+ 11 MR 98.600 98.610 98.600 0.000 12558
+ 11 JN 98.460 98.470 98.460 0.000 15591
+ 11 SE 98.280 98.300 98.290 0.000 13157
+ 11 DE 98.140 98.150 98.140 0.010 7394
+ 12 MR 98.020 98.040 98.030 0.000 3483
+ 12 JN 97.930 97.970 97.950 0.010 274
+ 12 SE 97.850 97.930 97.910 0.010 108
+ 12 DE 97.780 97.830 97.830 0.010 7

The rates do suggest that by mid-year we might see another 0.5% increase in rates throughout 2011, but this is financially speculative noise peeking through the woodwork. 3-month corporate paper is yielding 1.17% at present, so there is not much of a divergence between existing rates and implied December 2010 rates.

In terms of long-term rates, Canadian 10-year bonds have crept up to 2.98% at the end of November 10th trading. While this is not anything significant in terms of the range over the past 12 months, it is up about a quarter point over the past month. The big scare for real estate gurus out there was likely in the early second quarter (April) when 10-year bond rates went to 3.7%. Still, this is nothing close to the past decade’s average of 4.3%, and the peak rate of roughly 5.96% back in the year 2001.

I am struggling to make what is a rather boring interest rate post interesting, so I will leave it here.

Potash Corporation takeover should be approved

The Canadian government has until November 3 to make a decision on whether they will allow the takeover of Potash Corporation (TSX: POT) to proceed.

I do not know what the decision will be politically – the only time that the Canadian government has exercised its right to refuse a foreign takeover of a Canadian company was in 2008 when Macdonald Deitweiller (TSX: MDA) was prevented from selling itself as Canada did not want its sole satellite manufacturer going into foreign hands.

As a matter of public policy the sale should proceed. First, the buying company is overpaying. Secondly, the media (and Saskatchewan government) is making it sound like that Potash Corp is the only potash producer in Canada – while they are large, it is not the only source of Potash production in the country.

If the Canadian government refuses this sale, you will likely see any built-in takeover premiums of large Canadian companies be reduced. This is also an increasing trend as of late – governments trying to protect their strategic interests in natural resources, including oil and gas, uranium, water, metals and other resources. One wouldn’t be shocked to see the ultimate resource – intelligent people – be a future (but hidden) consideration in the future.

Politically, however, the decision might be different.